Abstract
Background
Breast cancer survivors (BCSs) often have potential unmet needs. Identification of the specific needs of BCSs is very significant for medical service provision. This study aimed to (1) investigate the unmet needs and quality of life (QoL) of BCSs in China, (2) explore the diverse factors associated with their unmet needs, and (3) assess the association between their unmet needs and QoL.
Methods
A multicentre, cross-sectional survey was administered to 1210 Chinese BCSs. The Cancer Survivor Profile-Breast Cancer and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast scale were administered to survivors who gave informed consent to participate. Data were analysed using t-test, ANOVA, multiple regression analysis, and Pearson correlations.
Results
The 1192 participants completed questionnaires (response rate 98.51%). Our study reveals that the most prevalent unmet needs were in the ‘symptom burden domain’. The unmet needs of BCSs depend on eleven factors; age, time since diagnosis, education level, occupation, payment, family income status, stage of cancer, treatment, family history of cancer, pain, and physical activities. To ensure the provision of high-quality survivorship care and a high satisfaction level, more attention should be paid to actively identifying and addressing the unmet needs of BCSs. The problem areas identified in the Cancer Survivor Profile for breast cancer were negatively associated with all subscales of QoL except the health behaviour domain, with the correlation coefficient ranging from − 0.815 to − 0.011.
Conclusion
Chinese BCSs exhibit a high demand for unmet needs in this study, and the most prevalent unmet needs were in the ‘symptom burden domain’. There was a significant association between patients’ unmet needs (as defined in the Cancer Survivor Profile for breast cancer) and QoL. Future research should focus on enhancements to survivorship or follow-up care to address unmet needs and further improve QoL.
Keywords: Breast cancer survivors, Unmet needs, Quality of life, Cross-sectional survey
Introduction
Female breast cancer is currently the most common type of cancer experienced by women worldwide, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases in 2020 [1]. The five-year relative survival rate for individuals with breast cancer is 82% [2]. Early detection and diagnosis, multimodal therapies, and continuing advances in treatment efficacy have greatly improved survival rates. However, this positive development entails survivors having disease- and treatment-related unmet needs [3]. Therefore, more attention must be paid to the unmet needs of breast cancer patients and to their quality of life (QoL) during and after treatment. The majority of breast cancer survivors (BCSs) reported informational, psychological, physical, and social support needs [4–6]. The prevalence of unmet needs among BCSs varied across studies. Approximately 44% -93% of BCSs reported at least one unmet need [7–13].
Information provision refers to information provided by healthcare providers/nurses in oral, written, or other form [14]. A systematic review indicated that patients with fulfilled information needs and patients who experience fewer information barriers have better QoL and lower levels of depression and anxiety [14]. Informational needs were positively associated with future levels of anxiety as well [15]. Healthcare providers should pay more attention to patient-centred information provision. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer results in considerable psychological consequences, and breast cancer may remain unrecognised and untreated. Schmid-Büchi et al. reported that what patients’ most needed help with were psychological issues [16]. This generally stems from the inability of patients to efficiently cope with the psychological burden generated by a cancer diagnosis and treatment. Martínez Arroyo et al. [17] and Skandarajah et al. [18] reported that needs focusing on the possibility of recurrence were the most frequent among BCSs. Fear of cancer recurrence is a near-universal worry for cancer survivors [19]. Persistent high levels of preoccupation or worry and hypervigilance to bodily symptoms presenting for at least 3 months are key characteristics of clinical fear of cancer recurrence [20]. Patients fear or worry that the cancer will return or progress. When fear of cancer recurrence is left unaddressed, it tends to remain stable across disease trajectories over time [19]. Physical unmet needs include primarily sleep difficulty, pain, cognitive impairment, swelling, numbness and paraesthesia of the affected arm or around the affected breast, physical limitations on the affected arm, heart disease, and sexual difficulties. Lack of social support and higher unmet needs are associated with poorer QoL [21].
According to a systematic review conducted by Ho et al., the health-related QoL of breast cancer patients is poorer than the general population in Asia [21]. Additionally, breast cancer patients with comorbidities and who are undergoing chemotherapy, have lower social support, and more unmet needs are associated with poorer QoL [21, 22]. Unmet needs are strong predictors of the QoL of recurrent breast cancer patients. This suggests that the QoL of women with recurrent breast cancer is possibly affected more by unmet needs than their socio-demographic or clinical characteristics [23].
Factors potentially associated with the unmet needs of BCSs have been reported in previous studies, including such sociodemographic characteristics as age [3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 24–26], employment status [4, 26, 27], marital status [12, 13], education [12, 13], and lower income [25]; such psychological problems/symptoms as stress [4], distress [3, 28], fear of recurrence [7, 17] depressive symptoms [13, 28], anxiety [12, 13], cognitive-emotional impacts [17], and suicidal ideation [4]; such clinical characteristics as chemotherapy [3, 29], cancer stage [24], treatment phase [24], length of time since primary surgery [7], receiving endocrine treatment alone, duration since diagnosis [26], being in an advanced stage [26], negative hormone receptor status [28], hormone treatment [27], receiving endocrine treatment alone [29], negative hormone receptor status [28], and comorbidities [13]; and other related factors such as QoL [30, 31], multiplicity [4], life events [13], conflict in interpersonal relations [16], and a lower performance status [26].
In view of the apparent disparities in socio-demographic factors, cultural aspects, racial aspects, healthcare systems, and service provision between countries, unmet needs and the details of how those needs are experienced and communicated are likely to vary. Approximately 11% of worldwide cases of breast cancer occur in China and incidents have increased rapidly in recent decades [32]. However, few studies have ever been conducted to investigate the prevalence of and factors related to the unmet needs of BCSs in Mainland China. To date, the survey tools of most studies have been universal and do not capture the full extent and diverse aspects of breast cancer patients’ unmet needs. To provide appropriate medical services for BCSs, efforts should be made to identify factors associated with unmet needs and the specific characteristics of those unmet needs. To address these gaps, the Hunan Cancer Hospital, in collaboration with nine provincial cancer hospitals, designed and implemented this study. In the present study, we analyse the experiences of BCSs from a comprehensive perspective to identify problems with physical and emotional symptoms, health behaviour, financial strain, and healthcare-seeking skills during and after treatment; explore diverse factors associated with unmet needs; and assess the association between the unmet needs and QoL of BCSs in China. Knowledge of the gaps in care can guide the development and implementation of appropriate medical programs and services to address the broad scope of needs of BCSs.
Methods
Procedure and participants
Cluster random sampling was used in this study. First, all cancer hospitals in China are categorised geographically as eastern, western, southern, northern, or central. Two hospitals were randomly selected from each region, resulting in cancer hospitals from 10 provinces (Hunan, Guangxi, Beijing, Jiangxi, Henan, Guizhou, Guangdong, Hebei, Xinjiang, and Zhejiang) being included in the study. The sample size was calculated using G-Power software, version 3.1.9.2 based on a linear multiple regression test with an alpha error of 5%, a power of 95%, and 73 predictors in the model. The required sample size was 384. Accounting for invalid questionnaires, 20% was added to the calculated sample size. The final sample size needed to be larger than 461. All questionnaires were completed using online survey methods and using Questionnaire Star (www.wjx.cn), an electronic data collection tool. A QR code was generated giving participants access to the online questionnaire.
From May 2020 to November 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1210 participants who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study at ten cancer hospitals. Patients were eligible if they (a) were female, (b) had been diagnosed with breast cancer, (c) had completed primary therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation), (d) were aged 18 or over, (e) were able to understand all questions, (f) provided informed consent. Patients with mental disorders, hearing disorders, or diseases affecting questionnaire completion were excluded from the study. This study was approved by the Hunan Cancer Hospital Research Ethics Committee (Quick review No. 02 in 2020).
Measures
A self-developed information sheet was designed to elicit information from participants on demographic and disease-related variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, religion, place of residence, marital status, occupation, employment status, education level, family income status, whether patients are receiving Medicare, stage of cancer, and surgery type. Additionally, the questionnaire battery was comprised of the following two measures.
Cancer survivor profile-breast Cancer
To measure the unmet needs experienced by breast cancer patients following treatment, the Cancer Survivor Profile-Breast Cancer (CSPro-BC) was used. The original version of the CSPro-BC comprises 5 domains, 18 subscales, and 73 items [33]. Each item was scored using a five-point Likert-type scale (1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Totally disagree, 5 = Strongly agree). The 5 domains were symptom burden (6 subscales, 14 items), function (5 subscales, 6 items), health behaviour (3 subscales, 3 items), financial strain (1 subscale, 2 items), and healthcare-seeking (3 subscales, 3 items). The scale has good acceptability, internal consistency, and validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranged from 0.55 to 0.94 for the 5 subscales.
The CSPro-BC has been translated into Chinese and this version has also been rigorously validated [34]. Forward and backward translation, content confirmation, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency checking by providers and BCSs led to the final version of the instrument employed in the survey, with 5 domains, 18 subscales, and 71 items. The good internal reliability of the Chinese version of the CSPro-BC was established by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.65–0.92 for the 5 subscales.
Functional assessment of Cancer therapy-breast
To assess the multidimensional QoL in patients with breast cancer, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) scale was used. The scale consists of 5 subscales and 36 items assessing patients’ physical well-being, functional well-being, emotional well-being, social/family well-being, and breast cancer-specific concerns. Each item was scored using a five-point Likert-type scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = A little bit, 2 = Somewhat, 3 = Quite a bit, 4 = Very much). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the FACT-B total score was 0.90, with five subscales ranging from 0.63 to 0.86 [35]. The FACT-B has been translated into Chinese. The internal consistency of the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the Chinese version for the five domains mentioned above ranged from 0.59 to 0.85 [36].
Data analysis
SPSS version 22.0 was employed to conduct all data analysis. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe participant characteristics and to summarise the data.
To determine the factors affecting the CSPro-BC level, univariate analyses (independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA) were first conducted to explore differences between the variables in terms of CSPro-BC level. The factors used in these analyses were chosen based on the literature review [3, 4]. Factors shown to be significant were then subjected to multiple regression analysis. T-test and ANOVA were used to compare the scores for each factor according to the demographic and other characteristics of BCSs. Multiple regression analysis was applied to assess the influences of major variables on the level of CSPro-BC. In multiple regression analysis, the need scores for each factor were used as dependent variables, and variables that were found to be statistically significant by univariate analysis were used as independent variables. Pearson correlations were conducted to reveal the correlations between the CSPro-BC and FACT-B.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
Table 1 shows the characteristics of our study participants. All but 18 of the 1210 patients invited to participate completed the questionnaires; with 10 took less than 5 minutes to fill in the questionnaire, and 8 provided rather regular answers. The mean patient age was 47.51 years (SD 9.09) and the majority were married (93.3%).
Table 1.
Characteristics of participants (N = 1192)
| Variable | Group | N | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | < 40 | 235 | 19.71% |
| 40–49 | 454 | 38.09% | |
| 50–59 | 401 | 33.64% | |
| ≥ 60 | 102 | 8.56% | |
| Time since diagnosis (months) | ≤ 12 | 273 | 22.9% |
| 13–24 | 583 | 48.9% | |
| 25–60 | 277 | 23.2% | |
| ≧ 61 | 59 | 5.0% | |
| Marital status | Single | 18 | 1.5% |
| Married | 1112 | 93.3% | |
| Divorced | 38 | 3.2% | |
| Widowed | 21 | 1.7% | |
| Cohabitation | 3 | 0.3% | |
| Education level | Primary school | 229 | 19.2% |
| Secondary school | 516 | 43.3% | |
| High school or technical secondary school | 202 | 16.9% | |
| University | 236 | 19.8% | |
| Master’s degree or above | 9 | 0.8% | |
| Employment | Employed | 297 | 24.9% |
| Unemployed | 895 | 75.1% | |
| Occupation | Unemployed | 895 | 75.1% |
| Public institution | 163 | 13.7% | |
| Privately or individually owned business | 34 | 2.9% | |
| Worker | 23 | 1.9% | |
| Farmer | 5 | 0.4% | |
| Private enterprise | 72 | 6.0% | |
| Place of residence | City | 441 | 37.0% |
| Township | 329 | 27.6% | |
| Village | 422 | 35.4% | |
| Family income status (RMB/month/per person) | <2000 | 201 | 16.9% |
| 2000–4999 | 359 | 30.1% | |
| 5000–9999 | 432 | 36.2% | |
| 10,000–19,999 | 183 | 15.4% | |
| ≥ 20,000 | 17 | 1.4% | |
| Payment | Free medical treatment | 29 | 2.4% |
| Medical insurance | 482 | 40.4% | |
| New rural cooperative medical insurance | 510 | 42.8% | |
| Self-paying | 83 | 7.0% | |
| Serious disease insurance or commercial insurance | 88 | 7.4% | |
| Stage of breast cancer | I | 254 | 21.3% |
| II | 567 | 47.6% | |
| III | 279 | 23.4% | |
| IV | 92 | 7.7% | |
| Treatment | Surgery therapy | 109 | 9.2% |
| Surgery + chemotherapy | 385 | 32.3% | |
| Surgery + radiation therapy | 14 | 1.2% | |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + radiation therapy | 211 | 17.7% | |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + radiation therapy + hormone therapy | 179 | 15.0% | |
| Surgery + targeted therapy | 41 | 3.4% | |
| Othersa | 253 | 21.2% | |
| Family history of cancer | Yes | 63 | 5.3% |
| No | 1129 | 94.7% |
Othersa: any other treatment method or combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, or other treatment methods
Unmet needs of BCSs
The domains of the top three of unmet needs were symptom burden and healthcare-seeking skills (Table 2). The need that was most unmet was fear of recurrence.
Table 2.
Unmet needs of participants
| Rank | Sub-scales | Score range | Score (Mean ± SD) | Scoring rate | Domains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fear of recurrence | 6 ~ 30 | 20.70 ± 6.37 | 69.0% | Symptom burden domain |
| 2 | Patient-provider communication | 6 ~ 30 | 18.97 ± 5.48 | 63.2% | Health care–seeking skills domain |
| 3 | Body image | 3 ~ 15 | 8.92 ± 3.30 | 59.5% | Symptom burden domain |
| 4 | Health information | 4 ~ 20 | 11.30 ± 5.07 | 56.5% | Health care–seeking skills domain |
| 5 | Social | 4 ~ 20 | 10.61 ± 3.44 | 53.1% | Function domain |
| 6 | Physical activity | 2 ~ 8 | 4.25 ± 1.02 | 53.1% | Health behavior domain |
| 7 | Information acquisition | 2 ~ 10 | 5.21 ± 2.74 | 52.1% | Health care–seeking skills domain |
| 8 | Sleep | 4 ~ 20 | 10.35 ± 3.91 | 51.8% | Function domain |
| 9 | Work | 1 ~ 10 | 5.04 ± 0.88 | 50.4% | Function domain |
| 10 | Healthcare competence | 6 ~ 30 | 14.90 ± 4.43 | 49.7% | Health care-seeking skills domain |
| 11 | Financial strain | 4 ~ 20 | 9.69 ± 4.47 | 48.5% | Financial strain domain |
| 12 | Fatigue | 5 ~ 25 | 10.44 ± 4.78 | 41.8% | Symptom burden domain |
| 13 | Anxiety | 4 ~ 20 | 7.97 ± 3.80 | 39.9% | Symptom burden domain |
| 14 | Cognitive | 6 ~ 30 | 11.84 ± 5.19 | 39.5% | Function domain |
| 15 | Depressive symptoms | 4 ~ 20 | 7.74 ± 3.73 | 38.7% | Symptom burden domain |
| 16 | Sexual | 2 ~ 10 | 3.77 ± 1.56 | 37.7% | Function domain |
| 17 | Pain | 5 ~ 25 | 9.31 ± 4.73 | 37.2% | Symptom burden domain |
| 18 | Diet | 2 ~ 10 | 3.24 ± 1.63 | 32.4% | Health behavior domain |
Needs by clinicopathological characteristics
The < 40 age group showed higher levels of unmet needs in all domains except healthcare-seeking skills. The ≤12-months-since-diagnosis group showed higher levels of unmet needs in the domains of symptom burden, function, and health behaviour, whereas > 61-months-since-diagnosis group showed higher levels of unmet needs in the domains of financial strain and healthcare-seeking skills. The Stage IV group and the group with a family history of cancer showed higher levels of unmet needs in all domains except health behaviour. The group that had received a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy showed higher levels of unmet needs in all domains except health behaviour and healthcare-seeking skills. The group with severe pain and the group with heavy physical activities, showed higher levels of unmet needs in all domains (Table 3).
Table 3.
Needs by clinicopathological characteristics of participants
| Variable | symptom burden | function | health behavior | financial strain | health care-seeking skills | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||||
| < 40 | 70.00 ± 19.96 | 43.18 ± 8.38 | 7.83 ± 2.05 | 10.26 ± 4.53 | 51.49 ± 12.37 | 179.99 ± 35.68 |
| 40–49 | 66.63 ± 20.03 | 42.31 ± 9.05 | 7.56 ± 2.07 | 10.17 ± 4.43 | 50.57 ± 11.98 | 174.36 ± 38.33 |
| 50–59 | 61.55 ± 22.03 | 40.24 ± 9.05 | 7.33 ± 2.24 | 9.01 ± 4.31 | 49.58 ± 11.63 | 163.59 ± 40.38 |
| ≥ 60 | 60.80 ± 22.58 | 40.31 ± 7.93 | 7.06 ± 2.18 | 8.91 ± 4.72 | 50.16 ± 11.31 | 162.36 ± 38.23 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.005 | < 0.001 | 0.257 | < 0.001 |
| Time since diagnosis(months) | ||||||
| ≤ 12 | 78.27 ± 18.47 | 44.03 ± 8.02 | 8.38 ± 2.73 | 11.30 ± 4.35 | 54.14 ± 10.83 | 192.82 ± 33.23 |
| 13–24 | 59.69 ± 19.39 | 40.57 ± 8.80 | 7.22 ± 1.88 | 9.00 ± 4.33 | 49.07 ± 11.89 | 162.00 ± 36.75 |
| 25–60 | 62.21 ± 19.38 | 40.96 ± 9.36 | 7.12 ± 1.70 | 9.01 ± 4.23 | 48.64 ± 11.49 | 164.69 ± 38.71 |
| > 61 | 70.92 ± 23.73 | 43.78 ± 9.35 | 7.83 ± 2.21 | 12.24 ± 4.72 | 54.25 ± 13.94 | 184.93 ± 44.95 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Stage of breast cancer | ||||||
| I | 59.35 ± 19.69 | 40.06 ± 8.39 | 7.61 ± 2.64 | 8.20 ± 4.29 | 47.91 ± 11.84 | 160.02 ± 37.26 |
| II | 65.10 ± 20.39 | 41.97 ± 8.80 | 7.48 ± 1.96 | 9.74 ± 4.27 | 50.28 ± 12.10 | 171.24 ± 38.20 |
| III | 66.88 ± 21.22 | 41.42 ± 9.17 | 7.34 ± 2.03 | 10.36 ± 4.55 | 51.58 ± 10.83 | 173.58 ± 39.63 |
| IV | 75.37 ± 20.70 | 44.27 ± 9.56 | 7.70 ± 2.00 | 11.96 ± 4.44 | 54.28 ± 12.43 | 189.66 ± 39.04 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.380 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Treatment | ||||||
| Surgery therapy | 53.18 ± 17.86 | 39.38 ± 8.57 | 7.44 ± 2.39 | 7.00 ± 3.85 | 45.81 ± 12.01 | 150.52 ± 35.13 |
| Surgery + chemotherapy | 59.57 ± 20.86 | 40.38 ± 8.64 | 7.05 ± 2.09 | 8.74 ± 4.28 | 48.69 ± 11.49 | 160.60 ± 38.12 |
| Surgery + radiation therapy | 61.86 ± 22.45 | 40.64 ± 8.97 | 8.50 ± 2.14 | 8.71 ± 4.53 | 52.36 ± 11.14 | 169.36 ± 39.36 |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + radiation therapy | 69.01 ± 19.83 | 42.65 ± 8.93 | 7.65 ± 1.78 | 10.68 ± 4.31 | 50.48 ± 12.02 | 176.82 ± 37.27 |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + radiation therapy + hormone therapy | 79.66 ± 16.87 | 44.71 ± 9.03 | 8.29 ± 1.80 | 12.15 ± 4 .03 | 55.52 ± 11.27 | 197.15 ± 32.05 |
| Surgery + targeted therapy | 77.61 ± 14.28 | 43.85 ± 9.44 | 8.54 ± 2.83 | 11.71 ± 4.09 | 56.51 ± 11.80 | 193.80 ± 31.32 |
| Othersa | 63.17 ± 19.02 | 41.09 ± 8.59 | 7.27 ± 2.26 | 9.47 ± 4.37 | 50.12 ± 11.33 | 167.84 ± 37.33 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Family history of cancer | ||||||
| Yes | 77.49 ± 19.08 | 44.60 ± 9.92 | 7.68 ± 2.71 | 10.92 ± 4.14 | 55.46 ± 11.67 | 193.06 ± 37.53 |
| No | 64.40 ± 20.71 | 41.45 ± 8.82 | 7.48 ± 2.11 | 9.62 ± 4.48 | 50.10 ± 11.85 | 169.58 ± 38.79 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.469 | 0.025 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Pain | ||||||
| Mild | 65.45 ± 16.75 | 39.58 ± 8.29 | 7.08 ± 1.77 | 8.49 ± 4.10 | 47.69 ± 11.22 | 155.96 ± 32.90 |
| Moderate | 80.64 ± 13.88 | 45.51 ± 8.61 | 8.33 ± 2.23 | 12.00 ± 4.16 | 55.57 ± 11.13 | 198.39 ± 29.62 |
| Severe | 95.45 ± 16.86 | 48.01 ± 8.19 | 8.69 ± 3.41 | 13.49 ± 3.64 | 58.80 ± 10.87 | 220.51 ± 27.07 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Physical activity | ||||||
| Light | 62.95 ± 20.74 | 41.24 ± 8.85 | 6.89 ± 1.65 | 9.37 ± 4.46 | 49.59 ± 11.69 | 166.47 ± 38.44 |
| Medium | 71.20 ± 19.40 | 42.55 ± 8.85 | 9.28 ± 2.23 | 10.62 ± 44.33 | 52.53 ± 12.14 | 183.04 ± 37.19 |
| Heavy | 91.50 ± 21.23 | 51.38 ± 10.06 | 12.25 ± 5.60 | 13.38 ± 5.24 | 65.00 ± 6.50 | 232.50 ± 33.24 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Othersa: any other treatment method or combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, or other treatment methods
Needs by sociodemographic characteristic
The employed group and free medical treatment group were found to have higher levels of unmet needs in the domains of symptom burden, function, health behaviour, and healthcare-seeking skills, but the unemployed group and the new rural cooperative medical insurance group showed higher levels of unmet needs in financial strain. The group with a family income status of < 2000 RMB/month showed higher levels of unmet needs in all domains and the worker and farmer groups showed higher levels of unmet needs in sysptom burden domain and health behavior domain. Regarding the level of needs according to the place of residence, the city group showed higher levels of unmet needs in the domains of symptom burden, health behaviour, and healthcare-seeking skills. Regarding the level of needs according to education level, the high school or technical-secondary school group was found to have higher levels of unmet needs in the domains of function, health behaviour, and financial strain, whereas the master’s degree group was found to have unmet needs in the domains of symptom burden and healthcare-seeking skills. In addition, there was no significant difference in the level of unmet needs according to marital status (Table 4).
Table 4.
Needs by sociodemographic characteristics of participants
| Variable | symptom burden domain | function domain | health behavior domain | financial strain domain | health care-seeking skills domain | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marital status | ||||||
| Unmarried | 65.94 ± 18.29 | 40.39 ± 7.29 | 8.00 ± 1.64 | 10.11 ± 4.66 | 50.83 ± 15.83 | 174.72 ± 40.71 |
| Married | 64.76 ± 20.80 | 41.58 ± 8.91 | 7.46 ± 2.10 | 9.67 ± 4.48 | 50.32 ± 11.80 | 170.29 ± 38.95 |
| Divorced | 67.00 ± 18.37 | 42.03 ± 8.69 | 7.53 ± 1.80 | 9.66 ± 3.91 | 51.11 ± 12.05 | 174.74 ± 34.31 |
| Widowhood | 77.81 ± 25.72 | 42.10 ± 10.29 | 8.48 ± 4.37 | 10.19 ± 4.74 | 52.24 ± 13.78 | 186.48 ± 49.81 |
| Cohabitation | 67.67 ± 20.60 | 53.00 ± 5.20 | 8.33 ± 1.53 | 11.00 ± 6.25 | 48.67 ± 10.26 | 183.67 ± 42.10 |
| p-value | 0.074 | 0.248 | 0.189 | 0.952 | 0.943 | 0.347 |
| Education level | ||||||
| Primary school | 63.67 ± 22.97 | 41.63 ± 9.33 | 7.16 ± 2.00 | 10.28 ± 4.79 | 50.48 ± 11.64 | 168.71 ± 41.96 |
| Secondary school | 60.22 ± 19.54 | 40.87 ± 9.05 | 7.12 ± 2.03 | 9.07 ± 4.30 | 48.07 ± 11.11 | 161.32 ± 37.07 |
| High school or technical secondary school | 77.53 ± 18.00 | 43.76 ± 8.38 | 8.73 ± 2.46 | 11.78 ± 3.95 | 55.60 ± 11.06 | 194.03 ± 32.26 |
| University | 65.90 ± 18.99 | 41.39 ± 8.46 | 7.56 ± 1.81 | 8.70 ± 4.36 | 50.61 ± 12.81 | 172.78 ± 37.08 |
| Master degree or above | 79.78 ± 21.57 | 41.44 ± 5.36 | 7.78 ± 2.22 | 9.56 ± 2.92 | 57.56 ± 16.01 | 196.67 ± 38.83 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | 0.004 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Employment status | ||||||
| Employed | 68.52 ± 19.40 | 42.25 ± 8.79 | 8.00 ± 2.38 | 9.10 ± 4.15 | 51.11 ± 12.73 | 180.06 ± 36.90 |
| Unemployed | 63.95 ± 21.16 | 41.40 ± 8.94 | 7.32 ± 2.03 | 9.89 ± 4.56 | 50.14 ± 11.60 | 167.75 ± 39.29 |
| p-value | 0.001 | 0.158 | < 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.223 | < 0.001 |
| Occupation | ||||||
| Unemployed | 63.95 ± 21.16 | 41.40 ± 8.94 | 7.32 ± 2.03 | 9.89 ± 4.56 | 50.14 ± 11.60 | 167.75 ± 39.29 |
| Public institution | 68.72 ± 19.13 | 42.67 ± 8.90 | 7.85 ± 2.34 | 8.83 ± 4.27 | 50.83 ± 12.72 | 180.01 ± 36.99 |
| Privately or individually owned business | 58.41 ± 20.74 | 39.59 ± 9.47 | 7.76 ± 1.46 | 8.35 ± 4.30 | 46.03 ± 13.85 | 161.38 ± 41.24 |
| Worker | 77.91 ± 15.71 | 43.74 ± 8.42 | 9.48 ± 3.65 | 10.22 ± 3.12 | 55.74 ± 12.35 | 197.13 ± 28.00 |
| Farmer | 78.60 ± 28.64 | 39.20 ± 12.21 | 9.20 ± 1.92 | 11.20 ± 5.54 | 52.40 ± 9.56 | 191.60 ± 51.21 |
| Private enterprise | 69.15 ± 18.09 | 42.26 ± 8.01 | 7.90 ± 2.21 | 9.57 ± 3.94 | 52.58 ± 11.97 | 182.72 ± 33.11 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | 0.250 | < 0.001 | 0.038 | 0.029 | < 0.001 |
| Place of residence | ||||||
| City | 68.07 ± 19.63 | 41.82 ± 8.54 | 7.88 ± 2.39 | 9.45 ± 4.16 | 51.73 ± 12.10 | 176.44 ± 37.18 |
| Township | 60.00 ± 19.66 | 41.11 ± 9.33 | 6.97 ± 1.96 | 9.01 ± 4.32 | 48.51 ± 11.54 | 162.05 ± 37.73 |
| Village | 65.94 ± 22.20 | 41.79 ± 8.95 | 7.49 ± 1.90 | 10.48 ± 4.78 | 50.44 ± 11.78 | 171.78 ± 40.85 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | 0.486 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Family income status(RMB/month/per person) | ||||||
| <2000 | 83.70 ± 16.34 | 46.79 ± 8.06 | 8.24 ± 2.11 | 14.05 ± 3.75 | 56.68 ± 10.50 | 204.84 ± 28.95 |
| 2000–4999 | 70.07 ± 19.77 | 42.92 ± 9.03 | 8.15 ± 2.52 | 11.82 ± 3.52 | 53.53 ± 11.48 | 182.86 ± 36.00 |
| 5000–59,999 | 57.58 ± 17.93 | 39.45 ± 8.57 | 6.87 ± 1.76 | 7.57 ± 3.27 | 47.55 ± 11.13 | 155.76 ± 34.45 |
| 10,000–19,999 | 52.48 ± 15.93 | 38.74 ± 7.61 | 6.79 ± 1.47 | 5.78 ± 2.80 | 43.70 ± 10.64 | 145.18 ± 29.06 |
| ≥ 20,000 | 66.41 ± 20.15 | 38.76 ± 4.98 | 8.18 ± 1.63 | 9.24 ± 4.52 | 53.59 ± 10.76 | 172.94 ± 33.06 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Payment | ||||||
| Free medical treatment | 74.62 ± 19.25 | 42.79 ± 8.56 | 8.97 ± 3.16 | 9.59 ± 2.92 | 53.72 ± 9.04 | 188.76 ± 30.22 |
| Medical insurance | 65.17 ± 20.29 | 41.41 ± 8.92 | 7.53 ± 2.29 | 9.10 ± 4.23 | 50.57 ± 12.30 | 171.09 ± 38.81 |
| New rural cooperative medical insurance | 68.04 ± 21.49 | 42.37 ± 9.02 | 7.65 ± 1.98 | 10.80 ± 4.62 | 51.45 ± 11.59 | 176.02 ± 39.49 |
| Self-paying | 58.64 ± 18.22 | 41.24 ± 8.75 | 7.12 ± 1.85 | 9.31 ± 4.26 | 49.37 ± 11.94 | 161.94 ± 35.36 |
| Serious disease insurance or commercial insurance | 50.48 ± 13.75 | 38.27 ± 7.63 | 6.25 ± 1.39 | 6.88 ± 3.53 | 43.02 ± 9.25 | 141.67 ± 27.62 |
| p-value | < 0.001 | 0.002 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Multiple regression analysis by needs
Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the influence of each independent variable on the total score for each unmet need. The results are shown in Table 5. The results revealed that age, time since diagnosis, education level, occupation, payment, family income status, stage of cancer, treatment, family history of cancer, pain, and physical activities were associated with unmet needs and overall unmet needs. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the level of unmet needs according to place of residence and employment status. The ≥40 age groups showed a lower level of recognition of needs in the symptom burden, health behavior and financial strain domains. The high school or technical secondary school group showed a higher level of recognition in symptom burdern and health behavior domain. In addition, the payment of serious disease insurance or commercial insurance method had a significant effect on unmet needs in the symptom burdern, health behaviour, and healthcare seeking skills domain. Patients who had family history of cancer were more likely to have unmet symptom burdens. Treatment type was most commonly associated with all domains except health behavior domain. The levels of unmet needs were higher in all domains in the group with serve pain while the unmet needs in symptom burden, function and health behavior were higher in patients with medium and heavy physical activity.
Table 5.
The result of multiple regression analysis by needs
| Variable | symptom burden | function | health behavior | financial strain | healthcare-seeking skills | Total needs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | T | β | T | β | T | β | T | β | T | β | T | |
| Age group (reference: < 40), y | ||||||||||||
| 40–49 | −0.088 | −3.32* | 0.035 | 0.941 | −0.094 | −2.911* | −0.017 | −0.593 | −0.035 | −0.979 | −0.082 | −2.981* |
| 50–59 | −0.123 | −4.499* | 0.039 | 1.019 | −0.068 | −2.055* | −0.08 | −2.658* | −0.017 | −0.459 | −0.118 | −4.133* |
| ≥ 60 | −0.097 | −4.133* | −0.045 | −1.353 | −0.062 | −2.141* | −0.046 | −1.752* | 0.01 | 0.323 | −0.081 | −3.286* |
| Time since diagnosis (reference: < 12), months | ||||||||||||
| 13–24 | −0.117 | −4.347* | 0.048 | 1.269 | −0.121 | −3.671* | − 0.029 | − 0.964 | − 0.015 | − 0.409 | −0.075 | − 2.681* |
| 25–60 | − 0.068 | − 2.578* | 0.112 | 3.05* | − 0.121 | − 3.788* | − 0.027 | − 0.932 | − 0.031 | −0.867 | − 0.048 | −1.739 |
| > 61 | −0.024 | −1.151 | 0.05 | 1.697* | −0.011 | −0.444 | 0.042 | 1.785 | 0.018 | 0.639 | 0.005 | 0.227 |
| Education level (reference: Primary school) | ||||||||||||
| Secondary school | −0.015 | −0.552 | − 0.043 | −1.147 | 0.021 | 0.633 | − 0.047 | −1.597 | − 0.055 | − 1.507 | − 0.032 | −1.13 |
| High school or technical secondary school | 0.077 | 2.786* | −0.027 | − 0.689 | 0.079 | 2.339* | 0.019 | 0.621 | 0.055 | 1.463 | 0.058 | 2.003* |
| University | 0.035 | 1.14 | 0.015 | 0.34 | −0.013 | − 0.333 | − 0.004 | − 0.125 | 0.042 | 0.997 | 0.021 | 0.652 |
| Master degree or above | 0.033 | 1.622 | −0.058 | −2.014* | − 0.003 | − 0.107 | 0.029 | 1.298 | 0.068 | 2.44* | 0.035 | 1.658 |
| Employment status (reference: unemployed) | ||||||||||||
| Employed | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Occupation (reference: unemployed) | ||||||||||||
| Public Institution | 0.054 | 2.388* | 0 | −0.015 | 0.057 | 2.05* | −0.013 | − 0.534 | 0.018 | 0.594 | 0.104 | 4.389* |
| privately or individually-owned business | −0.014 | − 0.721 | 0.02 | 0.745 | 0.037 | 1.561 | −0.013 | − 0.593 | − 0.026 | −0.999 | 0.004 | 0.218 |
| Worker | 0.036 | 1.797 | −0.009 | −0.33 | 0.068 | 2.833* | −0.036 | −1.659 | 0.019 | 0.712 | 0.044 | 2.112* |
| Farmer | 0.013 | 0.668 | 0.034 | 1.246 | 0.043 | 1.817 | −0.023 | −1.079 | −0.01 | − 0.388 | 0.002 | 0.116 |
| Private enterprise | 0.043 | 2.127* | −0.011 | − 0.38 | 0.038 | 1.528 | 0.019 | 0.874 | 0.049 | 1.782 | 0.084 | 3.998* |
| Place of residence (reference: village) | ||||||||||||
| City | 0.033 | 1.211 | 0.038 | 0.987 | 0.031 | 0.927 | 0.001 | 0.026 | 0.053 | 1.404 | 0.046 | 1.609 |
| Township | 0.01 | 0.416 | −0.025 | − 0.77 | − 0.035 | −1.249 | 0.024 | 0.95 | 0.016 | 0.506 | 0.027 | 1.1 |
| Family income status(RMB/month/per person)(reference: < 2000) | ||||||||||||
| 2000–4999 | − 0.189 | −6.487* | 0.08 | 1.95 | 0.024 | 0.677 | −0.179 | −5.565* | − 0.094 | −2.385* | − 0.188 | −6.167* |
| 5000–9999 | − 0.305 | −9.322* | 0.22 | 4.803* | − 0.105 | −2.627* | − 0.568 | −15.739* | − 0.251 | −5.655* | − 0.374 | − 10.955* |
| 10,000–19,999 | −0.285 | −9.7* | 0.207 | 5.049* | −0.097 | − 2.701* | − 0.545 | − 16.818* | − 0.296 | −7.446* | − 0.357 | − 11.646* |
| ≥ 20,000 | −0.06 | −2.958* | 0.089 | 3.15* | −0.002 | −0.087 | − 0.11 | −4.934* | −0.021 | − 0.768 | − 0.072 | −3.394* |
| Payment (reference: free medical treatment) | ||||||||||||
| Medical insurance | −0.068 | − 1.066 | − 0.052 | − 0.585 | − 0.191 | − 2.472* | − 0.063 | − 0.903 | − 0.04 | − 0.461 | − 0.072 | − 1.098 |
| New rural cooperative medical insurance | − 0.075 | − 1.124 | − 0.04 | − 0.427 | − 0.144 | − 1.777 | − 0.04 | − 0.544 | − 0.022 | − 0.245 | − 0.067 | − 0.968 |
| Self-paying | −0.07 | − 1.839 | − 0.056 | −1.045 | − 0.076 | − 1.63 | 0.005 | 0.13 | 0 | − 0.005 | − 0.039 | − 0.987 |
| Serious disease insurance or commercial Insurance | −0.106 | − 2.784* | 0.024 | 0.458 | −0.144 | −3.093* | − 0.079 | − 1.881 | − 0.111 | − 2.141* | − 0.118 | − 2.97* |
| Stage of breast cancer (reference: I) | ||||||||||||
| II | −0.003 | − 0.106 | − 0.085 | − 2.206* | − 0.06 | −1.79 | 0.049 | 1.615 | 0.008 | 0.213 | 0.012 | 0.413 |
| III | −0.005 | − 0.179 | − 0.058 | −1.519 | − 0.065 | − 1.977* | 0.046 | 1.517 | 0.038 | 1.029 | 0.005 | 0.165 |
| IV | 0.048 | 2.088* | −0.081 | −2.511* | − 0.045 | − 1.605 | 0.063 | 2.47* | 0.039 | 1.262 | 0.049 | 2.046* |
| Treatment (reference: surgery) | ||||||||||||
| Surgery + chemotherapy | 0.089 | 2.438* | −0.114 | −2.219* | − 0.049 | −1.105 | 0.056 | 1.376 | 0.042 | 0.843 | 0.059 | 1.555 |
| Surgery + radiation therapy | 0.012 | 0.608 | −0.015 | −0.546 | 0.007 | 0.269 | 0.012 | 0.52 | 0.029 | 1.058 | 0.015 | 0.716 |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + radiation therapy | 0.139 | 4.188* | −0.1 | −2.153* | −0.002 | − 0.054 | 0.122 | 3.343* | 0.022 | 0.499 | 0.1 | 2.903* |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + radiation therapy + hormone therapy | 0.215 | 6.517* | −0.118 | −2.556* | 0.025 | 0.613 | 0.151 | 4.171* | 0.095 | 2.123* | 0.174 | 5.076* |
| Surgery + targeted therapy | 0.095 | 4.049* | −0.074 | −2.231* | 0.025 | 0.857 | 0.041 | 1.589 | 0.066 | 2.061* | 0.08 | 3.251* |
| Others* | 0.133 | 3.987* | −0.05 | −1.079 | −0.037 | − 0.899 | 0.129 | 3.494* | 0.08 | 1.773 | 0.111 | 3.189* |
| Family history of cancer (reference: no) | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 0.052 | 2.703* | −0.047 | −1.749 | − 0.041 | − 1.729 | 0.016 | 0.766 | 0.049 | 1.866 | 0.048 | 2.4* |
| Pain (reference: mild) | ||||||||||||
| Moderate | 0.313 | 14.452* | −0.175 | −5.761* | 0.105 | 3.959* | 0.095 | 3.961* | 0.134 | 4.559* | 0.267 | 11.798* |
| Severe | 0.35 | 16.404* | −0.09 | −3.008* | 0.072 | 2.784* | 0.108 | 4.586* | 0.131 | 4.544* | 0.282 | 12.665* |
| Physical activity (reference: light) | ||||||||||||
| Medium | 0.011 | 0.536 | 0.101 | 3.63* | 0.388 | 16.022* | −0.007 | −0.318 | − 0.006 | − 0.232 | 0.023 | 1.106 |
| Heavy | 0.039 | 1.988* | 0.037 | 1.368 | 0.166 | 6.97* | 0.03 | 1.375 | 0.059 | 2.223 | 0.066 | 3.231* |
*:P < 0.05
Others*: any other treatment method or combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, or other treatment methods
Relationship between the CSPro-BC and FACT-B
The Pearson correlation (Table 6) showed that all subscales of the CSPro-BC were negatively associated with all subscales of QoL except the health behaviour domain, with the correlation coefficient ranging from − 0.815 to − 0.011.
Table 6.
Relationship between unmet needs and QoL
| Items | Physical | Social/Family | Emotional | Functional | Additional concerns | Total score FCAT-B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptom burden | − 0.790** | − 0.072* | − 0.674** | −0.484** | − 0.770** | − 0.765** |
| Function | −0.529** | −0.380** | − 0.538** | −0.551 | − 0.507** | −0.686** |
| Health behavior | −0.368** | 0.136** | −0.203** | −0.058* | − 0.380** | −0.242** |
| Financial strain | −0.559** | −0.011* | − 0.467** | −0.399** | − 0.589** | −0.558** |
| Healthcare-seeking skills | −0.523** | − 0.177** | − 0.493** | −0.453** | − 0.545** | −0.602** |
| Total score of CSPro-BC | −0.779** | −0.167** | − 0.690** | −0.558** | − 0.777** | −0.815** |
*: P<0.05, **:P<0.01
Discussion
The identification and management of unmet needs is an essential component of high-quality healthcare for cancer survivors [4]. To our knowledge, this study is the first multicentre cross-sectional report to analyse unmet needs and QoL among Chinese BCSs. The following three aspects will be discussed based on the objectives and results of the research: (i) the unmet needs of BCSs, (ii) factors associated with the unmet needs of BCSs, and (iii) the relationship between the unmet needs and QoL of BCSs in mainland China.
Unmet needs of BCSs
Findings from this study highlighted that most BCSs faced physical, emotional, and practical concerns after completing treatment. The top 3 unmet needs in this study were in the domains of symptom burdens and healthcare-seeking skills. The level of unmet needs for Chinese BCSs was found to be highest for fear of recurrence, patient-provider communication, and body image. The results of this study are similar to a Korean study that found that the highest level of unmet needs was ‘needed help in coping with fear of recurrence’ [4]. Martínez Arroyo et al. and Skandarajah et al. also reported that needs focused on the possibility of recurrence were the most frequent [17, 18]. However, Chou et al. reported that the most unmet supportive need of BCSs in Taiwan was in the psychosocial domain (40.4%), followed by the nutritional domain (28.4%) and patient care (20.8%), and with the lowest needs concerning the domains of health information, treatment, and finances (11.9, 3.5, and 0.2%) [24].
The healthcare-seeking skills domain of the CSPro-BC ranked second in this study, in which patient-provider communication and health information were found to be highest. Some previous studies [7, 18, 37] showed that the most prevalent unmet needs of BCSs were in the information domain. Even for survivors who are years beyond their diagnosis and treatment, many information needs remain unmet, such as age-appropriate cancer information and information on diet, nutrition, exercise, complementary/alternative healthcare services, assistance with health insurance, mental health counselling, infertility, and religious and spiritual counselling [38].
Body image disturbance is a common problem, resulting from side effects (e.g. alopecia, scars, or loss of breasts) after breast cancer treatment, and is related to poor QoL among BCSs [39]. Because the worry about cancer recurrence, most mainland Chinese women with breast cancer prefer to receive mastectomies [39]. A meta-analysis indicated that women undergoing a mastectomy alone had higher levels of cancer-related distress than those undergoing a mastectomy with immediate or delayed reconstruction [40]. Therefore, aggressive efforts and measures are needed to meet the unmet needs of survivors’ body image disturbances.
Factors associated with the unmet needs of BCSs
Our study reveals that the unmet needs of BCSs depend on eleven factors, including age, time since diagnosis, education level, occupation, payment, family income status, stage of breast cancer, treatment, family history of cancer, pain, and physical activity. To ensure the provision of high-quality survivorship care and a high satisfaction level, more attention should be paid to actively identifying and addressing the unmet needs of BCSs.
Age is a meaningful variable. This study also revealed that the < 40 age group showed a higher level of recognition of needs in the domains of symptom burden, health behaviour, and financial strain. The ≥50 age group showed fewer unmet needs. This difference can be attributed to the fact that patients who suffer from cancer face both expensive healthcare costs and unemployment stress, the young undertake more family responsibilities in China, and younger BCSs pay more attention to body image. Patients with higher education degree like master degree or above, had more unmet needs in health care-seeking skills. This was contrary to what we used to think that highly-educated patients might more easily acquire medical support. The possible explaination was that highly-educated patients learn more about the disease and they might question the doctor’s advice. Thus, its seems a little difficult to find a suitable physician who meet their high expectations.
In the analysis according to survival time after breast cancer diagnosis, the levels of unmet needs in the domains of symptom burden, function, and health behaviour were higher in the group with a survival time of less than 12 months. Cancer treatment is complicated and time-consuming; those who have survived for less than 12 months have not completed treatment. Therefore, the side effects of treatment and the symptom burden are more serious during this period. Meanwhile, we found that the more therapies that combined, the higher the perceived levels of unmet needs was. Survivors receiving target therapy seem to have more unmet needs and this result is consistent with the findings of Chae et al. [4]. Additionally, patients may not understand the disease or treatment well. A lack of awareness of side effects and disease-related resources also aggravate unmet needs.
In the analysis according to payment, people owned serious disease insurance or commercial insurance method had lower unmet needs in the symptom burdern, health behaviour, and healthcare seeking skills domain. In China, people who buy serious disease insurance or commercial insurance are wealther, thus, there is a high possibility for them to have access to medical resource to release symptom burdern and get more information support.
Side effects after treatment, heavy physical work, poor health and fatigue, depression, and emotional distress entail reduced work engagement and work ability among BCSs [41]. The prevalence of returning to work factors varies from 43 to 93% within 1 year of diagnosis [41]. Therefore, not returning to work and high treatment expenses aggravate the family financial burden. In this study, we found that for families with incomes below 2000 RMB/month have higher levels of unmet needs in all domains.
The analysis of needs according to cancer stage, the levels of unmet needs in the domains of symptom burden, function, health behaviour, and financial strain were higher in the group with advanced stage cancer. Advanced breast cancer patients undergo more complicated treatments, which cause more serious side effects, resulting a greater fear of recurrence and greater difficulty in performing activities of daily life. Other studies have reported the same results [4]. The group with a family history of breast cancer had greater needs, which is probably due to previous experiences with a family member who received breast cancer treatment [4], as well as possible negative attitude to cancer treatment for a sense of ‘unfairness’ for this undeserved illness.
In the analysis of needs according to pain, the levels of unmet needs were higher in all domains in the group with serve pain. Cancer pain is one of the most frequent and disturbing of all cancer-related symptoms [42]. In addition, this is one of the symptoms patients fear most. Pain suffering aggravates physical and symptoms burden [43]. Our study presented that patients with serve pain showed more unmet needs were in all domains, indicating an urgency to relieve pain.
The impaired physical activities was problaly due to fatigue [44], and it was proved that exercise intervention can promote physical functioning and decrease fatigue [45, 46]. In the analysis according to physical activities, the heavier the physical activity, the higher a BCS’s perceived level of unmet needs.
The relationship between unmet needs and QoL in BCSs
Understanding the relationship between unmet needs and QoL in BCSs is a stepping stone to improving QoL. This study shows that all domains of the CSPro-BC negatively correlate with all subscales of QoL (excluding the health behaviour domain) and overall QoL. BCSs’ QoL is influenced by unmet needs, treatment, disease-related symptom burdens, and psychological stress [21]. Unmet needs are strong predictors of QoL among recurrent breast cancer patients. A pervious study found that the greater the symptom burden that patients faced, the more unmet needs they have and the worse their QoL is [47]. This suggests that the QoL of women with recurrent breast cancer is possibly affected more by unmet needs than by their socio-demographic or clinical characteristics. Therefore, accurate assessment of unmet needs and provision of appropriate services may be an important step in helping survivors attain a high QoL.
Study limitations
One limitation of this study was its cross-sectional design, as it analysed the unmet needs identified in the CSPro-BC and related factors at only one point in the disease trajectory. Future studies should examine the prospective unmet needs identified in the CSPro-BC and their related factor trajectories at different time points to explore how unmet needs progress across the breast cancer trajectory. In addition, the participants’ Chinese cultural background may limit the generalisability of the results to other targeted populations from different cultures.
Implications for practice
Despite these limitations, the findings suggest some potential implications for practice. First, this study clarified the specific unmet needs of BCSs in China, related factors, association between unmet needs and QoL, which may be important entry points for intervention. Second, screening patients for unmet needs as early as possible and throughout treatment may be significant in reducing the disease-related burden of BCSs. Finally, the results offer a basis for deriving improved treatment outcomes and the grounds for providing comprehensive care for BCSs. Healthcare professionals should aim to detect patients’ unmet needs as early as possible and provide cancer survivorship care to BCSs to improve their QoL.
Conclusion
The Chinese BCSs in this study exhibit a high level of unmet needs, the most prevalent of which were found in the symptom burden domain. There was a significant association between patients’ unmet needs and QoL. Future research should focus on addressing unmet needs, the implementation of earlier interventions for emerging concerns, enhancing survivorship or follow-up care, and further improving the QoL of BCSs.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the support of staff and BCS at the 10 hospitals for assistance in conducting the survey.
Abbreviations
- BCS
Breast cancer survivors
- FCR
Fear of cancer recurrence
- CSPro-BC
Cancer Survivor Profile:Breast Cancer
- FACT-B
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast
- QoL
Quality of life
Authors’ contributions
Xiaofan Bu and Cai Jin contributed equally to this work and should be considered as the joint first authors. The study design and assessments were conceptualized and developed by XB, CJ, XL, RF, ASKC, PHFN, and YX analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the unmet needs and associated factors. XB and CJ wrote an outline of the paper, which was carefully revised, edited and discussed by XL, ASKC, and PHFN. All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the Hunan Provincial Health Commission (grant numbers 2020SK51101, 2020SK51104) and the Projects of Postgraduate Independent Exploration and Innovation of Central South University (grant number 2020zzts847).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable reason.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Hunan Cancer Hospital, China. All the experiment protocol for involving human data was in accordance with the guidelines of national/international/institutional or Declaration of Helsinki in the manuscript. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Ji JS, Zou X, et al. Changing cancer survival in China during 2003-15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(5):e555–e567. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lo-Fo-Wong DNN, de Haes HCJM, Aaronson NK, van Abbema DL, den Boer MD, van Hezewijk M, et al. Risk factors of unmet needs among women with breast cancer in the post-treatment phase. Psychooncology. 2020;29(3):539–549. doi: 10.1002/pon.5299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chae BJ, Lee J, Lee SK, Shin HJ, Jung SY, Lee JW, et al. Unmet needs and related factors of Korean breast cancer survivors: a multicenter, cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6064-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ahern T, Gardner A, Courtney M. Exploring patient support by breast care nurses and geographical residence as moderators of the unmet needs and self-efficacy of Australian women with breast cancer: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;23:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu XY, Chen YY, Cheng AS, Zeng YC, Ullah S, Feuerstein M. Conceptualizing problems with symptoms, function, health behavior, health-seeking skills, and financial strain in breast cancer survivors using hierarchical clustering. J Cancer Surviv. 2021. 10.1007/s11764-021-01068-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Ellegaard MB, Grau C, Zachariae R, Bonde Jensen AB. Fear of cancer recurrence and unmet needs among breast cancer survivors in the first five years. A cross-sectional study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):314–320. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1268714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng KK, Darshini Devi RD, Wong WH, Koh C. Perceived symptoms and the supportive care needs of breast cancer survivors six months to five years post-treatment period. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sleight AG, Lyons KD, Vigen C, Macdonald H, Clark F. Supportive care priorities of low-income Latina breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(11):3851–3859. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4253-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.So WKW, Chow KM, Chan HYL, Choi KC, Wan RWM, Mak SSS, et al. Quality of life and most prevalent unmet needs of Chinese breast cancer survivors at one year after cancer treatment. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(3):323–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang S, Li Y, Li C, Qiao Y, He S. Distribution and determinants of unmet need for supportive care among women with breast cancer in China. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:1680–1687. doi: 10.12659/MSM.905282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.von Heymann-Horan AB, Dalton SO, Dziekanska A, Christensen J, Andersen I, Mertz BG, et al. Unmet needs of women with breast cancer during and after primary treatment: a prospective study in Denmark. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(2):382–390. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.746468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pérez-Fortis A, Fleer J, Sánchez-Sosa JJ, Veloz-Martínez MG, Alanís-López P, Schroevers MJ, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with supportive care needs among newly diagnosed Mexican breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(10):3273–3280. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3741-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):761–772. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Barr K, Hill D, Farrelly A, Pitcher M, White V. Unmet information needs predict anxiety in early survivorship in young women with breast cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2020;14(6):826–833. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00895-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schmid-Büchi S, Halfens RJG, Müller M, Dassen T, van den Borne B. Factors associated with supportive care needs of patients under treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(1):22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martínez Arroyo O, Andreu Vaíllo Y, Martínez López P, Galdón Garrido MJ. Emotional distress and unmet supportive care needs in survivors of breast cancer beyond the end of primary treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(3):1049–1057. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4394-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Skandarajah AR, Lisy K, Ward A, Bishop J, Lacey K, Mann B, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in survivors of breast cancer one, three, and five years post-diagnosis: a cancer registry-based feasibility study. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(2):385–394. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02652-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lebel S, Maheu C, Lefebvre M, Secord S, Courbasson C, Singh M, et al. Addressing fear of cancer recurrence among women with cancer: a feasibility and preliminary outcome study. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(3):485–496. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0357-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mutsaers B, Butow P, Dinkel A, Humphris G, Maheu C, Ozakinci G, et al. Identifying the key characteristics of clinical fear of cancer recurrence: an international Delphi study. Psycho-Oncology. 2020;29(2):430–436. doi: 10.1002/pon.5283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ho PJ, Gernaat SAM, Hartman M, Verkooijen HM. Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020512. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Invernizzi M, Kim JS, Fusco N. Editorial: quality of life in breast cancer patients and survivors. Front Oncol. 2020;10:620574. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.620574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Park BW, Hwang SY. Unmet needs and their relationship with quality of life among women with recurrent breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(4):454–461. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chou YH, Chia-Rong Hsieh VC, Chen X, Huang TY, Shieh SH. Unmet supportive care needs of survival patients with breast cancer in different cancer stages and treatment phases. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(2):231–236. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pauwels EEJ, Charlier C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Lechner L, Van Hoof E. Care needs after primary breast cancer treatment. Survivors’ associated sociodemographic and medical characteristics. Psychooncology. 2013;22(1):125–132. doi: 10.1002/pon.2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Akechi T, Okuyama T, Endo C, Sagawa R, Uchida M, Nakaguchi T, et al. Patient’s perceived need and psychological distress and/or quality of life in ambulatory breast cancer patients in Japan. Psychooncology. 2011;20(5):497–505. doi: 10.1002/pon.1757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fang SY, Fetzer SJ, Lee KT, Kuo YL. Fear of recurrence as a predictor of care needs for long-term breast cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2018;41(1):69–76. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Luutonen S, Vahlberg T, Eloranta S, Hyväri H, Salminen E. Breast cancer patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy: distress, depressive symptoms and unmet needs of psychosocial support. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100(2):299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Capelan M, Battisti NML, McLoughlin A, Maidens V, Snuggs N, Slyk P, et al. The prevalence of unmet needs in 625 women living beyond a diagnosis of early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(8):1113–1120. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Uchida M, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Sagawa R, Nakaguchi T, Endo C, et al. Patients’ supportive care needs and psychological distress in advanced breast cancer patients in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(4):530–536. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sleight AG, Lyons KD, Vigen C, Macdonald H, Clark F. The association of health-related quality of life with unmet supportive care needs and sociodemographic factors in low-income Latina breast cancer survivors: a single-Centre pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(26):3151–3156. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1485179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li T, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan PC. Descriptive epidemiology of breast cancer in China: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;159(3):395–406. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3947-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Todd BL, Feuerstein M, Gehrke A, Hydeman J, Beaupin L. Identifying the unmet needs of breast cancer patients post-primary treatment: the Cancer survivor profile (CSPro) J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(2):137–160. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0428-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cheng ASK, Liu X, Kwok CTT, Chung RCK, Zeng Y, Feuerstein M. Chinese translation of a measure of symptom burden, functional limitations, lifestyle, and health care-seeking skills in breast cancer survivors: the Cancer survivor profile. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(1):130–147. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-0733-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, et al. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of Cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):974–986. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wan C, Zhang D, Yang Z, Tu X, Tang W, Feng C, et al. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the FACT-B for measuring quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106(3):413–418. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9511-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liao MN, Chen SC, Chen SC, Lin YC, Hsu YH, Hung HC, et al. Changes and predictors of unmet supportive care needs in Taiwanese women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012;39(5):E380–E389. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.E380-E389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zebrack B. Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(4):349–357. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou K, Wang W, Li M, An J, Huo L, He X, et al. Body image mediates the relationship between post-surgery needs and health-related quality of life among women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01400-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fang SY, Shu BC, Chang YJ. The effect of breast reconstruction surgery on body image among women after mastectomy: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(1):13–21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, Nahar AM, Mohd Taib NA, Su TT, et al. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:S8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chung M, Kim HK, Abdi S. Update on cannabis and cannabinoids for cancer pain. Curr Opin Anesthesio. 2020;33(6):825–831. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Valeberg BT, Miaskowski C, Hanestad BR, Bjordal K, Paul S, Rustoen T. Demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics are associated with average pain severity groups in a sample of oncology outpatients. J Pain. 2008;9(10):873–882. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Joly F, Lange M, Dos Santos M, Vaz-Luis I, Di Meglio A. Long-term fatigue and cognitive disorders in breast Cancer survivors. Cancers. 2019;11:189612. doi: 10.3390/cancers11121896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Juvet LK, Thune I, Elvsaas IKO, Fors EA, Lundgren S, Bertheussen G, et al. The effect of exercise on fatigue and physical functioning in breast cancer patients during and after treatment and at 6 months follow-up: a meta-analysis. Breast. 2017;33:166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Invernizzi M, de Sire A, Lippi L, Venetis K, Sajjadi E, Gimigliano F, et al. Impact of rehabilitation on breast Cancer related fatigue: a pilot study. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:556718. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.556718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cheng KKF, Wong WH, Koh C. Unmet needs mediate the relationship between symptoms and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(5):2025–2033. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2994-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable reason.