Table.5.
Analyzed dietary Ca level, % | Tibia ash percentage, % | Tibia ash Ca content, % | Tibia ash P, % | Tibia ash Ca: P ratio | Tibia BMD, mg/cm2 | Tibia BMC, g | Tibia breaking strength, N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.59 | 49.3bc | 35.1 | 17.8 | 1.96 | 136bc | 0.88b | 98c |
0.70 | 48.7c | 35.3 | 17.9 | 1.97 | 133c | 0.82b | 109bc |
0.80 | 50.2ab | 35.6 | 17.9 | 1.98 | 146b | 0.98ab | 129ab |
0.88 | 50.9a | 35.8 | 18.0 | 1.99 | 158a | 1.00ab | 140a |
0.98 | 50.6ab | 35.3 | 17.9 | 1.97 | 145b | 1.02ab | 134ab |
1.09 | 50.5ab | 35.6 | 17.9 | 1.99 | 141bc | 1.10a | 131ab |
1.18 | 49.4abc | 35.6 | 17.6 | 2.03 | 142bc | 0.95b | 132ab |
SEM | 1.17 | 0.79 | 0.34 | 0.052 | 8.0 | 0.105 | 19.7 |
P-value | |||||||
Ca level | 0.004 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.0003 | 0.027 | 0.008 |
Linear | 0.07 | – | – | – | 0.11 | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Quadratic | 0.003 | – | – | – | 0.0006 | 0.052 | 0.012 |
1Data represented the means of 6 replicates (n = 6)
2Abbreviations: BMC Bone mineral content, BMD bone mineral density
a-cMeans within a column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0.05)