Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;2(1):69–80. doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0057

Table 1.

Characterisation of studies.

Reference Design Cohort studied Average age (years) Parity Setting Study size and attrition EM location EM stages Prev. treatment Operative approach Hist. confirm. Follow-up time from baseline, y Pre- and post-operative outcome measures
LAP EM Follow-up
Abbott et al. (2003) POC ES 1–4 31 (20–48) 0: 80/175 (60%) 2 UK UH 261 176 135 OE: 38%; USL 88% Stage 1: 28%; Stage 2: 28%; Stage 3: 17%; Stage 4: 41% Analgesia: 70%; HT: 70% Prev. LAP: 70% CLET: 100% Yes 5 (3.2 (2–5)) VAS (10 cm) presented as median and IQR for dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual PP, dyschezia)
Chopin et al. (2005) ROC DE 31.7 ± 5.4 0.3 ± 0.61 (0–3) 1 French UAH 241 241 132 USL: 59.9%; vagina: 18.9%; bladder: 9.8%; intenstine: 12.1%; multiple locations: 39.4% Stage 1: 20.5%; Stage 2: 34.1%; Stage 3: 24.2%; Stage 4: 21.2% HT: 56%; Prev. LAP: 0.9 ± 1 CLET: 87.1%; LT: 12.9% Yes 3.7 ± 2.0 (median: 3.3) VAS (10 cm) for each pain type (dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, CPP, dyschezia, lower urinary tract symptoms)
Banerjee et al. (2006) POC ES 1–4 and no EM NS 1 UK tertiary EM centre in DGH 108 88 46 OE: 14%; USL: 59%; recto-vaginal: 43%; pouch of Douglas: 43%; intestine: 47% Stage 1: 39%; Stage 2: 16%; Stage 3: 9%; Stage 4: 36% NS CLET: 100% Yes 18 months post-surgery Pre- and post-operative global pain scores; these are a sum of VAS (0-5) for dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, non-cyclical pelvic pain, menstrual dyschezia, non-menstrual dyschezia, menstrual backache, non-menstrual backache
Milingos et al. (2006) POC ES 1–4 NS 1Greek UH 258 101 95 OE:61.8%; USL: 59%; recto-vaginal septum: 10.3% Minimal and mild: 21.4%; moderate and severe: 71.6% Prev. LAP: 14.7% CLET; LT: 6.3% no 6 months post-surgery VAS (10) for each pain type dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, non- menstrual pelvic pain.
Pain scores grouped as 0, 1-5, 6-7, 8-10
Ghai et al. (2020) RS* ES 1-4 NS 1 UK tertiary EM centre in DGH 102 96 100 ND Stages 1–3 ‘superficial’: 48%; stage 4 with bowel involvement ‘severe’: 52% GRA: 6/12 Stages 1–3: laser destruction or excision; Stage 4: excision (97.1 % CLEP); LT: 2.9% Severe: yes; superficial: NS 12 months post-surgery Pre- and post-operative pain component measured with EPH30 questionnaire

*Analysis of data from previous databases (1, 2); with infiltration of USL or Bladder/intestine/vagina; women with CPP who had laparoscopy; mean (range).

CLET, complete laparoscopic excisional treatment; DGH, district general hospital; EM, endometriosis; ES, endometrial stage; GRA; gonadotropin receptor antagonist; Hist. confirm., histological confirmation; HT, hormonal treatment; LAP, laparoscopy; LT, laparotomy; ND, not detailed; NS. Not stated; OE, ovarian endometrioma; POC, prospective observational cohort; Prev. previous; ROC, retrospective observational cohort; RS, retrospective secondary; UAH, university affiliated hospital; UH, university hospital.