Table 1.
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | Participants in studies | Certainty of evidence | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk with placebo or no treatment, range | Risk with carnitine | |||||||
Value | Range | n | Studies | Evidence | Grade | |||
Sperm concentration | 0.8–33.73 million/mL | MD 2.7 million/mL higher | 2.04 lower to 7.44 higher | – | 438 | 6 RCTs | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ | VERY LOWa,b,c |
Total sperm motility | 3.3–43.4% | MD 10.72% higher | 3.94 higher to 17.5 higher | – | 459 | 7 RCTs | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ | LOWa,c |
Progressive sperm motility | 4–24.41% | MD 9.82% higher | 2.01 higher to 17.62 higher | – | 231 | 3 RCTs | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ | LOWa,c |
Normal sperm morphology | 1.39–32.73% | MD 2.41% higher | 0.79 higher to 4.03 higher | – | 438 | 6 RCTs | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ | LOWa,c |
Clinical pregnancy |
||||||||
Study population | 113 per 1000 | 116 per 1000 | 61–221 | 1.03 (0.54–1.96) | 301 | 5 RCTs | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ | LOWa,b |
The population was men with abnormal semen characteristics. The intervention was l-carnitine and/or l-acetylcarnitine. The table compares placebo or no treatment. The outcomes measured were semen analysis parameters; clinical pregnancy; adverse events in a clinic or hospital.
aLack of blinding; bCrosses the line of no effect; cHiggins’s I2 test >50%.