Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 2;2(1):1–6. doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0030

Table 3.

Background of the two groups (LDM vs NLDM): 36–45 years old. Data are presented as (%) or as mean ± S.D. Statistically significant value is presented in bold.

LDM NLDM P value
No. of patients 37 55
Previousembryo transfer 1.60 ± 0.58 1.48 ± 0.62 0.3129a
Multigravida patients 17 (%) 32 (%) 0.2108b
Multipara patients  7 (%) 20 (%)   0.0631 *b
Patients with miscarriage 15 (%) 17 (%) 0.3740b
Patients with chronic endometriosis  3 (%) 11 (%) 0.3933)b
Patients with endometriosis  3 (%)  4 (%) 0.8826)b
Patients with endometrial polyp  3 (%) 3 (%) 0.6165)b
Serum AMH, ng/mL 3.25±2.91 3.60±2.69 0.4240a
Serum TSH >2.50 μIU/mL  6 (%)  7 (%) 0.5791)b
% of endometrial Lactobacillus* 99.4 (92.3–100) 5.4 (0.0–89.7) -

*Values presented as median (range); aStudent’s t-test. bChi-square test.

AMH, anti mullerian hormone LDM, Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota; NLDM, non-Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone.