Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0263383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263383

Table 6. Robustness checks.

Placebo test Alternative pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors Sample with shorter birth cohort span
Pro-environmental attitudes Pro-environmental behaviors Pro-environmental attitudes Pro-environmental behaviors Pro-environmental attitudes Pro-environmental
behaviors
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Education 0.146 0.145 0.043** 0.042** 0.022** 0.009**
(1.104) (0.108) (0.017) (0.018) (0.008) (0.004)
Controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 3,337 3,542 3,456 3,661 2,403 2,511
First-stage estimation
CSL 1.052 1.052 2.937*** 3.141*** 1.794*** 1.841***
(0.693) (0.693) (0.258) (0.262) (0.283) (0.273)
F-statistics 2.31 2.31 129.41 143.44 40.07 45.31

Note: The table reports the estimates from three robustness checks. 2SLS models are used for estimation. In columns (1)-(2), two placebo tests are conducted based on the assumption that the CSL had been implemented five years earlier than the actual implementation year of each province. In columns (3)-(4), alternative pro-environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors obtained from factor analysis are used as the dependent variables. In columns (5)-(6), the sample is restricted to individuals born less than 16 year earlier than the first CSL-affected cohort. All regressions have the same controls as in column (2) of Table 3, but their coefficients are suppressed for brevity. Robust standard errors are clustered at the cohort-city level and are reported in parentheses. ***, ** and * indicate 1%, 5% and 10% significance levels, respectively.