Table 6. Robustness checks.
Placebo test | Alternative pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors | Sample with shorter birth cohort span | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pro-environmental attitudes | Pro-environmental behaviors | Pro-environmental attitudes | Pro-environmental behaviors | Pro-environmental attitudes | Pro-environmental behaviors |
|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
Education | 0.146 | 0.145 | 0.043** | 0.042** | 0.022** | 0.009** |
(1.104) | (0.108) | (0.017) | (0.018) | (0.008) | (0.004) | |
Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Observations | 3,337 | 3,542 | 3,456 | 3,661 | 2,403 | 2,511 |
First-stage estimation | ||||||
CSL | 1.052 | 1.052 | 2.937*** | 3.141*** | 1.794*** | 1.841*** |
(0.693) | (0.693) | (0.258) | (0.262) | (0.283) | (0.273) | |
F-statistics | 2.31 | 2.31 | 129.41 | 143.44 | 40.07 | 45.31 |
Note: The table reports the estimates from three robustness checks. 2SLS models are used for estimation. In columns (1)-(2), two placebo tests are conducted based on the assumption that the CSL had been implemented five years earlier than the actual implementation year of each province. In columns (3)-(4), alternative pro-environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors obtained from factor analysis are used as the dependent variables. In columns (5)-(6), the sample is restricted to individuals born less than 16 year earlier than the first CSL-affected cohort. All regressions have the same controls as in column (2) of Table 3, but their coefficients are suppressed for brevity. Robust standard errors are clustered at the cohort-city level and are reported in parentheses. ***, ** and * indicate 1%, 5% and 10% significance levels, respectively.