Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 3;40(1):71–77. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03853-9

Table 1.

Study population characteristics

Author Year N Median age Baseline Grade
PSA
ng/ml
PSA density
ng/ml
PI-RADS distribution
Amin [22] 2020 100 64.5 4.7 (3.4–6.6) 0.11 (0.08–0.15) 0–2 51% High
3 36%
4 12%
5 1%
Chesnut [27] 2020 207 61 4.4 [3.6–5.5] NR 0–2 40% Moderate
3 37%
4 22%
5 1%
Gallagher [24] 2019 150 65.3 6.8 [6.2–7.3] 0.11 (0.08–0.17) 0–2 NR Moderate
3 NR
4 NR
5 NR
Jayadevan [14] 2019 332 62.8* 4.7 [2.5–7.0] 0.08 (0.05–0.14) 0–2 31% High
3 42%
4 22%
5 5%
Nougaret [34] 2017 371 60 4.7 [0.05–9.97] NR 0–2 NR Moderate
3 NR
4 NR
5 NR
Osses [26] 2020 111 66 6.8 [5.1–9.1] 0.17 (0.11–0.25) 0–2 47% Moderate
3 14%
4 32%
5 8%
Pepe [32] 2020 45 66 NR NR 0–2 NR Moderate
3 NR
4 NR
5 NR
Kornberg [21] 2018 300 61.5* NR NR 0–2 24% Moderate
3 12%
4 44%
5 21%

Study population characteristics. All included studies enrolled patients with GG1 prostate cancer. Calculations regarding reclassification were performed when patients developed ≥ GG2 prostate cancer

*Mean age