Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 31;52(2):800–810. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04987-w

Table 4.

Regression model testing the relationship between stigma and camouflaging

Predictor B B CI SE B β p f2
Age − 0.53 [− 1.04, − 0.022] 0.26 − 0.27 0.041 0.017
Age at diagnosis 0.59 [0.16, 1.02] 0.22 0.36 0.007 0.029
Female versus male − 7.62 [− 14.25, − 0.99] 3.36 − 0.15 0.024 0.019
Female versus non-binary − 6.47 [− 14.05, 1.12] 3.85 − 0.11 0.095 0.009
Autistic characteristics 0.25 [− 21, 0.71] 0.23 0.072 0.28 0.005
Stigma 2.42 [1.26, 3.57] 0.58 0.28  < 0.001 0.069

B unstandardised beta coefficient, B CI confidence intervals at 95% lower and upper bounds, SE B standard error, β standardised beta coefficient, f2 individual predictor effect size (effect size 0.02 considered small, 0.15 medium)