Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan 13;23(2):279–291. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00658-6

Table 2:

Best overall response based on investigator assessment by modified RECIST 1.1

Durva/treme
(n=26)
Durva/treme
Low-dose
radiation (n=26)
Durva/treme
Hypofractionated
radiation (n=26)
Total
population
(n=78)
Best overall response
 Partial response 3 (11.5, 1.2-21.8) 2 (7.7, 0-16.3) 3 (11.5, 1.2-21.8) 8 (10.3, 5-18)
 Stable disease 11 (42.3) 12 (46.2) 10 (38.5) 33 (42.3)
 Progressive disease 10 (38.5) 8 (30.8) 10 (38.5) 28 (35.9)
 Not Evaluable 2 (7.7) 4 (15.4) 2 (7.7) 8 (10.3)
Pairwise comparison with no radiation arm
 Difference in response rate NA −3.8% (90% CI: −17.3%-9.6%) 0% (−14.6%, 14.6%) NA
 Chi-squared p-value NA 0.64 0.99 NA
Disease control 8 (30.8, 15.9-45.7) 6 (23.1, 9.5-36.7) 9 (34.6, 19.3-50.0) 23 (29.5, 21-39)
Pairwise comparison with no radiation arm ]
 Difference in response rate NA −7.7% (90% CI: −27.9%-12.5%) 3.8% (90% CI: −17.5%-25.2%) NA
 Chi-squared p-value NA 0.53 0.77 NA

Data are n (%, 90% confidence interval) according to RECIST 1.1=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 excluding responses in irradiated lesions. Note: No complete responses were observed.