Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;59(2):498–509. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05033-4

Table 1.

Fatty acid composition of the oils and their blends analyzed by GC-FID

FA FO PO PO20 PO10 PO5
Palmitic Acid 6.61 ± 0.08e 41.36 ± 0.16a 33.55 ± 0.05d 36.73 ± 0.33c 39.17 ± 0.08b
Stearic Acid 6.59 ± 0.07b 3.91 ± 0.06a 3.83 ± 0.22a 4.20 ± 0.05a 3.44 ± 0.68a
Oleic Acid 21.61 ± 0.01e 43.83 ± 0.01a 38.83 ± 0.07d 41.31 ± 0.04c 42.78 ± 0.25f
Linoleic Acid (LA) 14.47 ± 0.10e 10.89 ± 0.11a 11.78 ± 0.04f 11.39 ± 0.12a, f 11.59 ± 0.81a, f
Alpha Linolenic Acid (ALA) 50.72 ± 0.23e 12.00 ± 0.16d 6.37 ± 0.19c 3.01 ± 0.2b
LA/ALA 0.29 ± 0.00e, d 0.98 ± 0.01d, g 1.79 ± 0.03c 3.85 ± 0.02b
S:M:P 1.00:1.64:4.94 1.00:0.97:0.24 1.00:1.04:0.64 1.00:1.01:0.43 1.00:1.00:0.34

The FA composition of the oils and their blends was determined by GC−FID. Two Way ANOVA and Bonferroni Posttests were applied to determine statistically significant differences between and among different FA present in the oils and blends. S represents total saturated fatty acids, M represents total monounsaturated fatty acids and P represents total polyunsaturated fatty acids. Different letters in a row represent statistically significant difference between the means

a–ep < 0.001;fp < 0.01 and gp < 0.05 PO10 versus PO20