Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;2:810288. doi: 10.3389/froh.2021.810288

Table 1.

Quality assessment according to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.

References
Bhrany et al.
[20]
de Pablo et al.
[21]
Mardini et al.
[22]
Item
Selection Representativeness of the exposed cohort. graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0001.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0001.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0001.jpg
Selection of nonexposed cohort. graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0001.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0001.jpg
Ascertainment of exposure. graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg
Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of the study. graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg
Comparability Study controls for other variables. Inline graphic
Inline graphic
Inline graphic
Inline graphic
Inline graphic
Inline graphic
Outcome Assessment of outcome. graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg
Degree of FU was long enough for outcomes to occur. graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg
Adequacy of FU of cohorts. graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg graphic file with name froh-02-810288-i0002.jpg
SCORE (/9) 6 8 6

Inline graphic, no agreement; Inline graphic, agreement.