Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;11(2):100836. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2022.100836

Table 2.

Evidence summary on acupuncture versus usual care for knee osteoarthritis.

Quality assessment
Summary of findings
Importance of outcome
No of patients
Effect
Quality
No of studies Design Limitations Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Acupuncture Usual care Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
Pain (follow-up median 6 months; measured with: WOMAC; range of scores: 0–100; Better indicated by less)
2 randomized trial not serious not serious not serious not serious none 520 531 NA SMD −0.52 (−0.66 to −0.39) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH
CRITICAL
Function (follow-up 6 months; measured with: WOMAC; range of scores: 0–100; Better indicated by more)
2 randomized trial not serious not serious not serious not serious none 520 531 NA SMD −0.45 (−0.59 to −0.32) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH
CRITICAL
Hematoma (follow-up 6 months; number of patients reporting reaction)
1 randomized trial not serious not serious not serious not serious none 12/326
(3.7%)
1/316 (0.3%) 11.63 (1.52 to 88.93)5 3% more (0.2% to 26% more) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH
IMPORTANT

NA, not available.

Note: Limitations refer to methodological flaws and conduct; Hematoma refers to adverse events related to acupuncture.