Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 13;53(6):2784. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2827

Table II.

Summary of the 18 randomized controlled trials included.

Study/country First day of intervention Period Follow-up Groups n = (women%) Withdraw Description of exercise/therapy Outcomes
Bade et al. 2017 USA (26) Day 4 11 w 12 M EXP1
(HI) = 84
n = 45, p = 54%
EXP2
(LI) = 87
n = 52, p = 66%
EXP1 = 0 EXP2 = 0 Both groups: Patients were seen 3/w for the first 6/w and 2/w over the next 5 w. (26 sessions). (45 min each session)
Both had education on healing.
Hi group: high-intensity, progression-based, rehabilitation programme-based. PRE targeting. Weight-bearing, functional, balance, agility, and activity exercise (2 sets- 8 rep). 30 min walking 5/w. swimming, cycling, elliptical machine, stair climber. LI group: time-based rehabilitation programme. 1) iso and ROM ex for the first 4/w. 2) slower transition to w-b ex. 3) less progression in difficulty of w-b ex 4) no resistance beyond body weight or elastic bands 5) restricted activity outside of ADLs for the first 4/w gradually building to 30 min by the end of therapy (restricted to walking and low-resistance cycling)
Stair-climbing test, TUG, 6MWT, ROM, MCS, SF-12, muscle strength, WOMAC
Beaupre et al. 2001 Canada (14) Day 3 7 d 6 M EXP=40 n = 20, p = 50% CON = 40 n = 13, p = 30% EXP = 9 CON = 11 EXP1: standard rehabilitation (ROM ex + strength ex + functional ex)
+ CPM
CON: Standard rehabilitation + SB
Walking, A/ROM Ex, isometric knee extension, stair-climbing.
Bruun-Olsen et al. 2009 Norway (18) Day 1 after Op 6 d 3 M EXP= 30 n = 22, p = 73%
CON = 33 n = 22, p = 67%
EXP = 5 CON = 2 EXP: CPM + active Ex: flexion/ extension exercises, active isometric contraction of the quadriceps, walking, climbing stairs (crutches), passive movement.
CON: same programme without CPM
ROM, pain, function, balance, walking
Demircioglu et al. 2015
Turkey (27)
Day 1 6 w 3 M EXP=30 n = 28, p = 93% CON = 30 n = 29, p = 96% EXP = 0 CON = 0 Both groups started 30 min (ROM)-(CPM)/w, ankle ROM ex, isometric quadriceps ex, stand up with a walker and fully extend their knees and active and assisted ROM ex, Active ROM and isometric quadriceps exercise, mobilization, active hip abduction and adduction ex. A home ex programme was recommended. Closed kinetic chain ex, 15 min cryotherapy. EXP: 1st/D after surgery 30-min NMES on VM 5/D week, for 4-6 weeks* Knee extension, flexion, pain, stiffness, function, TUG, SF-36.
Denis et al. 2006 Canada (15) Day 2 after Op 7-8 d 2 years EXP=28
n = 14, p = 51.9% CON = 27 n = 13, p= 46.4%
EXP = 1 CON = 0 EXP: CPM group 1 (35 min) + conventional
CON: Group 2 (2h): respiratory and circulatory Ex, strength extension EX and extension knee alignment, A/P knee flexion, abduction and add of the hip in the horizontal plane, and knee extensor muscle Ex, functional Ex
ROM (flexion-extension), TUG, WOMAC, length of stay
Ebert et al. 2013 Australia (24) Day 2 after Op 6 w 6 w EXP= 24 n = 7, p= 29%
CON = 26 n = 7, p= 27%
EXP = 0 CON = 0 EXP: Lymphatic drainage+ conventional therapy CON: conventional therapy active- assisted knee flexion + (active knee flexion + hip and knee flexion + functional Ex + CPM + Cryotherapy Active knee flexion and extension range of motion, lower limb girths (ankle, mid-patella, thigh, and calf), and pain
Hardt et al. 2018 Germany (23) Day 1 7 d 7±1 d EXP =22 n = 3, p = 12.5% CON = 25 n = 4, p = 15.6% EXP = 11 CON = 2 EXP: Genusport knee trainer extra. CON: active and passive knee mobilization, gait training, assisted walking with crutches, strength exercises, stair-climbing, manual lymphatic drainage, and cryotherapy 3 times daily with ice packs. Active and passive range of motion (ROM), pain, knee extension strength, TUG, 10-m Walk Test, 30-s Chair Stand Test, (KOOS), (KSS),
Jakobsen et al. 2014 Denmark (28) 1 w after Op 6 w 26 w EXP =35 n = 21, p=60%
CON = 37 n = 16, p=57%
EXP = 5 CON = 2 EXP: warming up + knee ROM Ex + knee extensor stretches and 1-legged balance Ex + strength training + functional training + balance training (the programme was applied earlier)
CON: Same programme
Walking, ROM (flexion, extension), pain, 6MWt, KOOS, Qof, activity of daily living, Oxford knee score.
Labraca et al. 2011 Spain (19) Within the first 24 4 d 4 d EXP = 153 n = 101, p = 73.1%
CON =153 n=110, p = 81.4%
EXP =15 CON = 18 EXP: P/A ROM + Strength Exflexion/extension + breathing + Functional EX (the programme was applied earlier)
CON: same programme
ROM, muscle strength, pain, autonomy, gait, and balance
Lastayo et al. 2009 USA (29) 1 - 4 years after Op 12 w 3 M EXP = 9 n= 7, p = 77.7% CON =8 n = 6 p = 75% EXP =0 CON = 0 EXP: Strength Ex + ROM+ NMES+ Walk+ setups + wall squat (Eccentric (ECC) resistance Exmachine/additional)
CON: same programme without ECC training
Quadriceps volume, extension strength, TUG, 6MWT, stairs (ascending, descending)
Lenssen et al. 2006 Netherlands (20) Day 1 4 d 3 M EXP = 21 n = 15, p = 71.4%
CON = 22 n = 17, p = 77.2%
EXP =0 CON = 0 EXP: A/P mobilization of the knee joint + active strengthening (quadriceps) + ADL functions treatment session (30 min), mean total of treatment sessions EXP- CPM more than the CON group CON: same programme Passive flexion ROM, active ROM and passive extension ROM, functional status, length of stay, pain, satisfaction with treatment
Lenssen et al. 2008 Netherlands (21) Day 1 after Op 17 d 3 M EXP= 30 n = 18, p = 60%
CON = 30 n = 21, p = 70%
EXP = 0 CON = 0 EXP: active and passive mobilization of the knee + strengthening of the quadriceps muscle + functional exercises + transfers from a supine position to sitting and from sitting to standing + walking and stair climbing
CON: same programme
Functional status,
ROM, perceived effect, postoperative medication, satisfaction with treatment, quantity, duration, and nature of PT intervention
Liao et al. 2013 Taiwan (30) At least 2 months after Op 8 w 8 w EXP= 58 n = 46, p = 79.3%
CON = 55 n = 37, p = 67.2%
EXP = CON = EXP: Exercises for strength + walking + endurance + 30 min function + 60 min balance CON: same programme without balance EX Walking, balance, functional walking, pain, stiffness, function
Mau-Moeller et al. 2014 Germany (22) Day 1 after Op 3 w 3 M EXP1
(Sling) = 19 n = 7, p = 36.8%
EXP2
CPM = 19 n=9, p = 47.3%
EXP1 = 7 EXP2 = 10 EXP1: Standard care + sling training (ST)
EXP2: Standard care = A/P ROM Ex + Strength (quadriceps) + ADL Ex + walking + climbing stairs. Ex for pain and tolerance
ROM, pain, physical activity, static posture control, function, QoL
Piva et al. 2017 USA (31) After discharge 3 d 6 M EXP=22 n = 18, p= 82%
CON = 22 n = 13, p= 59%
EXP = 0 CON = 0 EXP: Warm up-5 min. Endurance- 20 min treadmill walking 50-75% intensity. Resistance ex (knee extensor, flex, hip extension, abduction) 60-80%. ((2 steps - 8 rep). Skilled ex 15 min. Education sessions.
CON: Warm up - 15 min (bike). Endurance - 20 min (treadmill walking). Resistance ex - 40-50%. Both had home Ex
Pain, function, stair- climbing, chair-standing, single-leg stance, 6MWT, gait speed, daily activity
Rahmann et al. 2009 Australia (16) Day 4 14 d 12 M EXP= 18 n = 8 p= 44.4%
CON = 17 n = 12, p= 70.5%
EXP = 10 CON = 3 EXP: Water programme: Hip adduction/abduction, squats, heel raises walk, lunges, stability Ex, hip extension, knee: walking, lunges, ROM
CON: same programme without aquatic Ex
Hip abductor strength, walking speed, self-reported disability (WOMAC), ROM, quadriceps + hamstring strength, function
Schache et al. 2019 Australia (32) 2 w after Op 6 w 26 w EXP =54 n = 39, p = 72% CON = 51 n = 30, p = 58% EXP = 6 CON = 3 EXP: Extra exercises targeting the strengthening of the hip abductor muscles
CON: All participants received exercises to improve quadriceps, hamstring, and calf strength, increasing knee range of movement and improving walking and stair- climbing ability. These exercises have been described in detail previously.17 Manual therapy, including joint mobilization and massage,
Pain, knee extension- flexion, hip strength, quadriceps strength, chair- stand test, stair-climbing test, 40 m fast-paced walk, TUG, step taps, 6MWT.
Steven-Lapsley et al. 2012
USA (25)
Day 2 after Op 6 w 52 w EXP =35 n = 20, p=57.1%
CON = 31 n = 16, p=51.6%
EXP = 5 CON = 6 EXP: Exercises + NMES+ P/A ROM Ex + Functional Ex + ROM Ex + strengthening W/B non-W/B + walking
CON: Passive (ROM) + cycling + flexibility + walking + functional training + strength
Iso-quadriceps and hamstring torque and activation testing, NMES dose assessment, function, pain, ROM, health status questionnaires.

D-day, W-week, M-month, EXP-experimental, CON-control, ROM-range of motion, A/P ROM-active/passive range of motion, TUG-time up and go test, 6MWT-6 minutes walking test, MCS-Mental Component Score, SF-12-Short Form Survey, ADL-activity of daily living, CPM-Continuous Passive Motion, SB-Slide Board, EX-exercise, NMES-Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, VM-Vastus medialis, KOOS-Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, KSS-Knee Society Score, Qof-Quality of life, ECC-Eccentric, PT-Physiotherapy, OP-Operation, ST-Sling training, non-W/B non-weight bearing.