Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 4;17:23. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01960-w

Table 2.

3D-Γ analysis for investigated patient cases evaluating FRoG with RS-MC as reference, presenting mean (µ) and standard deviation (σ) in passing rate within the cohort

3D-Γ passing rates – FRoG vs. RS-MC
Test Type Dose threshold (DT) 2%/2mm 3%/1.5mm 5%/1mm
μ ±σ μ ±σ μ ±σ
3D-Γ Local DT10 97.3 1.7 96.1 2.2 94.7 2.4
DT50 97.8 1.9 96.8 2.5 96.0 2.4
DT90 96.7 3.4 97.1 3.0 98.6 1.6
Global DT10 98.3 1.2 97.5 1.6 97.5 1.5
DT50 98.0 1.9 97.2 2.3 97.1 2.0
DT90 96.7 3.4 97.2 3.1 98.6 1.6
Percent derivation (%Δ) in DVH metric – FRoG vs. RS-MC
Test Structure %ΔD98 %ΔD50 %ΔD2
μ ±σ μ ±σ μ ±σ
DVH CTV 0.49 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.43 0.38
Brainstem 0.37 0.24 1.63 2.06
Chiasma 0.70 0.90 1.00 1.32
Optic nerve (R) 0.38 0.36 0.52 0.33
Optic nerve (L) 2.68 3.23 0.54 0.89

Percent mean DRBE deviation in dose metrics (µ ± σ) applying fixed RBE = 1.1 between FRoG and RS-MC within the patient cohort