Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 5;824:153687. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153687

Table 3.

Detection rates and Ct values of spiked wastewater at marginal levels and unspiked wastewater samples.

Spiked wastewater
Unspiked wastewater
Blank Low Medium High Total detection rates Single detection rates Lower Ct Average Ct values
Small-UC 0 (0/2) 0 (0/2) 50% (1/2) 100% (2/2) 85.7% (30/35) 5.7% (2/35) 28.6% (8/28) 33.88 ± 3.01
Large-UC 0 (0/2) 0 (0/2) 100% (2/2) 100% (2/2) 85.7% (30/35) 5.7% (2/35) 71.4% (20/28) 32.85 ± 3.15
TRIzol Kit 0 (0/2) 0 (0/2) 50% (1/2) 100% (2/2) 67.7% (21/31) 3.2% (1/31) 20% (4/20) 34.39 ± 2.68
Viral Kit 0 (0/2) 50% (1/2) 100% (2/2) 100% (2/2) 77.4% (24/31) 12.9% (4/31) 80% (16/20) 33.46 ± 2.67

Blank: raw wastewater without spiking SARS-CoV-2 virus;

Low: SARS-CoV-2 virus-spiked wastewater with a concentration of approximately 1 copy/mL wastewater;

Medium: SARS-CoV-2 virus-spiked wastewater with a concentration of approximately 10 copies/mL wastewater;

High: SARS-CoV-2 virus-spiked wastewater with a concentration of approximately 100 copies/mL wastewater;

Total detection rates: the percentage of detectable samples for the chosen method;

Single detection rates: the percentage of samples which were only detectable for the chosen method;

Lower Ct: the percentage of samples with lower Ct values when detectable using both methods.