Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 4;12:1941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05781-z

Table 2.

Statistical comparisons between selected FAW collections using two-tailed t-test (TogS&P = Togo and São Tomé and Príncipe group).

Comparison (letters from Table 1) t-statistic df P-value
a COI-CS: TogS&P (dh)1 vs East (mpqrt)a 4.55 5 0.0061
b TpiCa2: TogS&P (dh)1 vs East (mpqrt)a 4.14 5 0.0090
c COI-CS: TogS&P (dh)2 vs East (cjkmpqrtuw)b 6.81 11 < 0.0001
d TpiCa2: TogS&P (dh)2 vs East (cjkmpqrtuw)b 3.07 11 0.0107
e COI-CS: West (a-m) vs East (n-w) 3.30 27 0.0028
f TpiCa2: TogS&P (dh) vs East (n-w) 2.25 14 0.0411
g TpiCa2: West (a-m) vs East (n-w) 1.70 29 0.1004
h TpiC: West (a-m) vs East (n-w) 1.37 27 0.1816
i West (a-m): COI-CS TpiC vs COI-RS TpiC 1.40 34 0.1721
j East (n-w): COI-CS TpiC vs COI-RS TpiC 7.91 20 < 0.0001
k COI-CS TpiC: West (a-m) vs East (n-w) 2.96 27 0.0063
l COI-RS TpiC: West (a-m) vs East (n-w) 4.38 27 0.0002
m TpiH: West (a-m) vs East (n-w) 1.10 27 0.2803

aOnly collections from 2016 to 201716.

bOnly collections from 2016 to 201726.