Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 5;11(3):864–879. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4471

TABLE 3.

Analyses of the GILncSig by Univariate and Multivariate Cox regression models in the three LUAD sets from TCGA

Variables Univariable model Multivariable model
HR 95% CI p‐value HR 95% CI p‐value
Training set (= 246)
GILncSig High/low 1.037 1.019–1.055 <0.001 1.033 1.015–1.051 <0.001
Age >65/<=65 1.001 0.981–1.022 0.906
Gender Male/female 1.268 0.826–1.946 0.277
Stage (III+IV)/(I+II) 1.816 1.473–2.239 <0.001 1.778 1.439–2.197 <0.001
Testing set (n = 244)
GILncSig High/low 1.073 1.019–1.128 0.007 1.057 1.004–1.112 0.034
Age >65/<=65 1.007 0.984–1.031 0.544
Gender Male/female 0.941 0.616–1.439 0.780
Stage (III+IV)/(I+II) 1.500 1.238–1.817 <0.001 1.481 1.219–1.799 <0.001
TCGA set (n = 490)
GILncSig High/low 1.029 1.019–1.039 <0.001 1.026 1.016–1.036 <0.001
Age >65/<=65 1.005 0.989–1.020 0.553
Gender Male/female 1.113 0.825–1.500 0.484
Stage (III+IV)/(I+II) 1.641 1.425–1.890 <0.001 1.623 1.408–1.871 <0.001