Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 5;22:65. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03450-x

Table 4.

Comparison of high-frequency codon pairs usage among 7 Rosales species

Codon Pairs Z. jujuba F. vesca M. domestica P. mume P. persica P. bretschneideri M. notabilis
nnAAnn 9.38 11.07 12.54 11.56 12.53 12.51 12.21
nnACnn 3.72 4.49 4.79 6.41 5.17 4.30 4.32
nnAGnn 7.52 8.10 8.78 7.84 8.26 9.22 8.98
nnATnn 8.39 10.29 10.46 9.85 10.53 9.73 9.43
nnCAnn 4.45 4.57 4.92 5.42 5.09 4.98 4.59
nnCCnn 4.31 2.09 1.15 2.46 2.25 0.92 0.70
nnCGnn 1.90 3.23 1.29 0.32 0.15 1.33 2.38
nnCTnn 4.33 4.45 4.51 3.61 3.70 4.49 4.33
nnGAnn 9.16 10.04 11.64 9.65 9.10 11.01 10.63
nnGCnn 4.97 3.72 2.97 4.60 4.37 3.38 3.97
nnGGnn 5.38 6.59 5.33 6.12 5.49 6.07 5.40
nnGTnn 5.58 4.66 5.21 5.02 5.42 5.60 4.83
nnTAnn 7.63 7.17 5.89 6.01 6.09 5.38 7.29
nnTCnn 5.02 4.41 4.24 5.18 4.86 3.84 3.86
nnTGnn 8.62 6.71 8.06 6.84 6.94 8.16 8.07
nnTTnn 9.65 8.40 8.24 9.12 10.04 9.08 9.02