Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Sep 3;144:146–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.005

Table 2.

Examining Differences in Average Shock based on Nonsuicidal Self-Injury History, Mood Condition, and Interpersonal Problem-Solving Outcomes During Visit 2

Model Description Model Results
Coeffienta (SE) p 95% CI
Model 1: Effectiveness
 NSSI History −24.18 (9.95) .02 −44.01, −4.36
 Mood Condition −7.32 (4.37) .09 −16.02, 1.39
 Effectiveness −2.56 (1.25) .04 −5.05, −.07
 NSSI × Mood × Effectiveness −1.98 (.94) .03 −3.84, −.11
Model 2: Obstacles
 NSSI History −4.75 (4.98) .34 −14.68, 5.17
 Mood Condition −.36 (1.57) .82 −3.49, 2.78
 Obstacles −.07 (.87) .93 −1.64, 1.50
 NSSI × Mood × Obstacles −.26 (.52) .62 −1.31, .78
Model 3: Alternatives
 NSSI History −1.67 (4.22) .69 −10.07, 6.72
 Mood Condition −.07 (1.13) .95 −2.33, 2.18
 Alternatives .17 (.86) .84 −1.55, 1.90
 NSSI × Mood × Alternatives −.31 (.58) .59 −1.47, .85

Note: NSSI = nonsuicidal self-injury; Effectiveness, Obstacles, and Alternatives = Means Ends Problem Solving task outcomes; Visit 1 Means Ends Problem Solving included as a covariate in all analyses;

a

= unstandardized regression coefficient