Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Sep 28;97(2):225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.08.021

Table 3.

Multivariable-Adjusted Associations of Adipose Tissue Phenotypes with Incident CVD in DHS and UKB

Incident CVD - DHS (N=1,731) Incident CVD - UKB (N=22,354)
N HR (95% CI) p-value N HR (95% CI) p-value
Model 1
High VAT-High LF 609 2.03 (1.28-3.21) .002 7848 1.59 (1.35-1.87) <.001
High VAT-Low LF 257 2.42 (1.41-4.13) .001 2822 2.00 (1.65-2.43) <.001
Low VAT-High LF 257 1.21 (0.63-2.31) .55 2982 1.40 (1.12-1.75) .003
Model 2
High VAT-High LF 609 1.20 (0.70 – 2.06) .50 7848 1.10 (0.90-1.34) .34
High VAT-Low LF 257 1.53 (0.86 – 2.71) .15 2822 1.50 (1.22-1.85) <.001
Low VAT-High LF 257 1.04 (0.54 – 1.99) .91 2982 1.24 (0.99-1.55) .06

Hazard ratios (HR) calculated for incident CVD using Cox proportional-hazards model. Referent group is low VAT-low LF (DHS N = 608; UKB N = 8702)

Model 1 is unadjusted

Model 2 is adjusted for age and BMI