Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(1):12–17. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2021.36

Table 2.

Association between regular aspirin use and self-reported walking pace in 14,315 PHS participants before and after propensity score weighting

Group Average annual aspirin use
≤60 d/year
(n)
Average annual aspirin use
>60 d/year
(n)
Crude OR
(95% CI)
p-value OR after Propensity Score
(95% CI)
p-value
Don’t walk regularly
Overall n=1870
311 1559 Ref Ref
Easy <2mph
Overall n =1739
252 1487 1.18
(0.98 to 1.41)
0.08 1.16
(0.97 to 1.39)
0.38
Normal, ≥2–2.9mph
Overall n =6314
912 5402 1.18
(1.03 to 1.36)
0.02 1.24
(1.08 to 1.43)
0.02
Brisk/Very Brisk ≥3mph
Overall n =4392
581 3811 1.31
(1.13 to 1.52)
<0.01 1.40
(1.21 to 1.63)
0.03

Sample sizes are provided for each category to allow for calculation of the raw ORs. For example, comparing “normal” walkers with those who “don’t walk” the estimated unadjusted OR is 1.18, as shown in the table. This is interpreted as: for an individual in the high-aspirin group, the relative odds of being in the “normal” walking group than the “don’t walk” group are18% greater with high aspirin exposure vs low aspirin exposure.