Table 2.

Simulation scenarios

Scen.	${\lambda }_{M,j}^I\left(t\right)$	${\lambda }_{D,j}^I\left(t\right)$	${\lambda }_{M,j}^C\left(t\right)$	${\lambda }_{D,j}^C\left(t\right)$	Weight for fatal event		Weight for non-fatal event
					Wei-Lachin	Rauch and Bakal	Wei-Lachin	Rauch and Bakal
1a	0.25·0.5	0.25·0.5	0.25	0.25	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
1b	proportional time independent hazards for event type				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
1c	assumptions for approaches by Wei-Lachin and Rauch fulfilled				0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
1d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
1e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
2a	0.25·0.5	0.25·0.7	0.25	0.25	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
2b	see Scenario 1 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
2c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
2d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
2e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
3a	0.25·0.7	0.25·0.5	0.25	0.25	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
3b	see Scenario 1 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
3c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
3d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
3e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
4a	0.25·1.5	0.25·0.7	0.25	0.25	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
4b	see Scenario 1 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
4c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
4d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
4e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
5a	0.25·0.7	0.25·1.5	0.25	0.25	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
5b	see Scenario 1 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
5c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
5d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
5e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
6a	0.25·0.5	0.1t·0.7	0.25	0.1t	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
6b	proportional hazards for each event type				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
6c	time dependent hazards for one event type				0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
6d	assumptions for approaches by Wei-Lachin and Rauch fulfilled				0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
6e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
7a	0.25·0.7	0.1t·0.5	0.25	0.1t	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
7b	see Scenario 6 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
7c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
7d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
7e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
8a	0.1t·0.5	0.25·0.7	0.1t	0.25	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
8b	see Scenario 6 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
8c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
8d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
8e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
9a	0.1t·0.7	0.25·0.5	0.1t	0.25	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
9b	see Scenario 6 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
9c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
9d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
9e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
10a	0.192t−0.2	0.084t−0.3	0.28t−0.3	0.32t−0.2	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
10b	non-proportional hazards for both event types (Weibull distributions)				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
10c	assumptions for approach by Wei-Lachin not fulfilled				0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
10d	assumptions for approach by Rauch et al. fulfilled				0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
10e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1
11a	0.084t−0.3	0.192t−0.2	0.32t−0.2	0.28t−0.3	0.5263	1	0.4737	0.9
11b	see Scenario 10 for underlying assumptions				0.5882	1	0.4118	0.7
11c					0.6667	1	0.3333	0.5
11d					0.7692	1	0.2308	0.3
11e					0.9091	1	0.0909	0.1

Scen. =Scenario; ${\lambda }_{M,j}^I\left(t\right),{\lambda }_{D,j}^I\left(t\right),{\lambda }_{M,j}^C\left(t\right)$, and ${\lambda }_{D,j}^C\left(t\right)$ are the hazards for the non-fatal (M) and fatal event (D) in the intervention (I) and control (C) group for all strata j, respectively