Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 8;13(1):128–144. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12908

Table 4.

The results of subgroup analysis in prevalence of depression in sarcopenia

Outcomes Numbers of studies Meta‐analysis results I 2 (%) P
Diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia
AWGS 6 0.31 (0.20–0.43) 89.4 <0.001
EWGSOP 6 0.29 (0.18–0.39) 92.5 <0.001
FNIH 1 0.09 (0.04–0.14) / /
Measurement method for LMM
BIA 9 0.32 (0.22–0.41) 93.4 <0.001
DEXA 2 0.12 (0.07–0.17) 36.8 0.208
Calf circumference 1 0.32 (0.18–0.47) / /
Mid‐arm muscle circumference 1 0.30 (0.19–0.41) / /
Measurement method for depression
GDS‐15 8 0.28 (0.20–0.36) 91.1 <0.001
GDS 1 0.64 (0.51–0.77) / /
CISR‐B 1 0.09 (0.04–0.14) / /
CES‐D 1 0.08 (0.00–0.16) / /
SDS 1 0.40 (0.22–0.58) / /
DSM 1 0.30 (0.19–0.41) / /
BMI
Overweight 2 0.36 (−0.18–0.90) 98.3 <0.001
Normal 9 0.29 (0.20–0.38) 90.0 <0.001
Unknown 2 0.22 (0.08–0.36) 85.3 0.001
Ethnicity
Asia 10 0.32 (0.22–0.41) 92.2 <0.001
America 2 0.11 (0.07–0.16) 50.7 0.154
Europe 1 0.30 (0.19–0.41) / /
Site
Community 12 0.27 (0.20–0.35) 91.9 <0.001
Clinic 1 0.41 (0.31–0.51) / /

Abbreviations: BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; DEXA, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; GDS‐15, 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale; CES‐D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SDS, Self‐rating Depression Scale; CISR‐B, Brazilian version of the Clinical Interview Scheduled Revised; DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.