Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 8;13(1):128–144. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12908

Table 5.

The results of subgroup analysis for ORs between sarcopenia and depression

Outcomes Numbers of studies Meta‐analysis results I 2 (%) P
Diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia
AWGS 8 1.85 (1.30–2.63) 77.0 <0.001
EWGSOP 6 1.60 (1.07–2.40) 75.9 <0.001
FNIH 1 2.23 (1.11–4.48) / /
Measurement method for LMM
BIA 12 1.58 (1.32–1.89) 76.4 <0.001
DEXA 1 5.45 (1.06–27.92) / /
Calf circumference 2 1.37 (0.45–4.16) 80.9 0.022
Measurement method for depression
GDS‐15 5 1.54 (1.04–2.29) 60.5 0.019
GDS 4 2.02 (1.52–2.69) 14.3 0.323
CISR‐B 1 2.23 (1.11–4.48) / /
CES‐D 1 5.45 (1.06–27.92) / /
SDS 1 1.05 (0.99–1.11) / /
HADS 1 1.10 (1.02–1.19) / /
BDI‐II 2 4.46 (2.03–9.81) 0 0.353
BMI
Overweight 4 1.81 (1.01–3.25) 72.1 0.013
Normal 8 1.95 (1.34–2.82) 79.6 <0.001
Unknown 3 1.45 (0.78–2.71) 75.6 0.006
Ethnicity
Asia 12 1.97 (1.45–2.67) 77.7 <0.001
America 2 1.31 (0.49–3.49) 80.8 0.022
Europe 1 1.10 (1.02–1.19) / /
Site
Community 12 1.47 (1.24–1.75) 75.4 <0.001
Clinic 1 1.50 (0.90–2.48) / /
Hospital 2 4.46 (2.03–9.81) 0 0.353

Abbreviations: BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; CES‐D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; DEXA, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; GDS‐15, 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale; SDS, Self‐rating Depression Scale; CISR‐B, Brazilian version of the Clinical Interview Scheduled Revised; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.