Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;141:105061. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105061

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Comparison between experimental activation sequences and the baseline (constituting no modelling personalisation) and fitted sequences. A) Examples of simulated activation sequences on the endocardial surface for QRSd-fit and TACT-fit CVs. The overlapping spheres represent the measured LAT. B) Mean absolute error between experimental and simulated paced activation. Bars and error bars represent the mean and standard deviation over all pigs, whereas the mean error for each pig is shown as filled circles. Results are shown for the baseline CV (0.67 m/s), QRSd-fit CV, and TACT-fit CV.