Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;12:806946. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.806946

TABLE 1.

Pseudoexon mutations that enhance pseudoexon branch point motifs.

Gene Intron # Mutation AGEZ Max BPS Pyr SNV? References
ABCA4 (NM_000350.3) 6 1 c.769-784C>T 17 0.22 Yes Sangermano et al. (2019)
CCN6 (NM_003880.4) 2 1 c.49-763G>T 24 −0.15 Yes Garcia-Segarra et al. (2012)
COL4A5 (NM_000495.5) 29 1 c.2395+1275C>G; c.2395+1292G>T 13 -> 59 −1.28 -> −0.03 Yes Wang et al. (2021)
DMD (NM_004006.3) 26 2 c.3603+820G>T 16 -> 42 0.57 -> 1.00 Yes Waddell et al. (2021)
37 2 c.5325+1740_5325+1757del 17 −1.33 -> −0.06 (MC) Bovolenta et al. (2008)
F8 (NM_000132.4) 13 2a c.2113+461_2113+473del 74 -> 61 0.83 (MC) Jourdy et al. (2018)
18 2b c.5999-798G>A 8 -> 65 0.23 No Pezeshkpoor et al. (2013)
KRIT1 (NM_194456.1) 6 1 c.262+132_262+133del 9 -> 88 0.14 Riant et al. (2014)
NF1 (NM_001042492.3) 8 3 c.889-941G>T 8 -> 21 −0.73 Yes Pros et al. (2008)
NF2 (NM_000268.4) 5 1 c.516+232G>A 15 -> 40 0.06 -> 3.37 No De Klein et al. (1998)
PAH (NM_000277.3) 11 1 c.1199+502A>T 34 −1.64 -> −0.16 Yes Jin et al. (2021)
PKHD1 (NM_138694.4) 56 1 c.8798-459C>A 46 −1.42 -> 1.95 No Chen et al. (2019)
PTS (NM_000317.3) 2 1b c.163+696del55 17 -> 28 −1.83 -> 1.01 (MC) Meili et al. (2009)
RPGRIP1 (NM_020366.4) 12 1a c.1468-263G>C 10 -> 24 −0.56 Yes Jamshidi et al. (2019), Zou et al. (2021)

“AGEZ,” “Max BPS,” and “Pyr SNV?” changes that are predicted to enhance branch point definition are in bold text. Cases where deletion mutations moved a branch point site closer to the AGEZ/acceptor site are noted in the “Max BPS” column as “(MC).”