Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 13;8(1):e08753. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08753

Table 6.

Thermomechanical performance of hemp composites.

Fiber fraction Matrix Type Pretreatment Processing technique E′ (GPa)a Tg (oC)b Ref.
Hemp noil (5%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Compression molding 2.31 175 [71]
Hemp (5%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Hydraulic hot-press 2.45 193 [117]
Hemp (10%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Hydraulic hot-press 2.65 196 [117]
Hemp noil (10%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Compression molding 2.69 177 [71]
Hemp noil (15%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Compression molding 3.61 180 [71]
Hemp (20%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Hydraulic hot-press 3.28 203 [117]
Hemp noil (20%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Compression molding 4.15 181 [71]
Hemp (25%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash Compression molding 2.98 195 [94]
Hemp (25%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Compression molding 3.18 211 [94]
Hemp (25%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + silane Compression molding 3.41 214 [94]
Hemp noil (25%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Compression molding 4.26 184 [71]
Hemp (30%) Polybenzoxazine Cyclohexane/ethanol wash + Alkali Hydraulic hot-press 4.15 202 [117]
a

Stiffness (E′ at 50 °C).

b

Tan δ peak temperature.