Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Oct 26;84:102490. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102490

Table 4.

Treatment completion for trauma-focused or non-trauma-focused treatments versus comparators.

Comparison k OR I2 kimp ORadj kout ORout FSN
Trauma v. all 8 0.85 [0.60, 1.21] 0.00 [0.00, 72.80] 2 0.94 [0.68, 1.31] 0 0.85 [0.60, 1.21] 0
Trauma v. Manual SUD 6 0.92 [0.63, 1.36] 0.00 [0.00, 83.67] 0 0.92 [0.63, 1.36] 0 0.92 [0.63, 1.36] 0
Non-trauma v. all 6 1.22 [0.93, 1.60] 0.00 [0.00, 71.98] 2 1.30 [1.00, 1.68] 0 1.22 [0.93, 1.60] 0
Non-trauma v. Manual SUD 5 1.24 [0.87, 1.78] 0.00 [0.00, 79.37] 2 1.41 [1.01, 1.95] 0 1.24 [0.87, 1.78] 0

Note: k = number of comparisons contributing to effect size estimate; OR = odds ratio, with ORs > 1 indicating higher treatment completion in the experimental group relative to the control condition; I2 = heterogeneity; kimp = number of studies imputed to account for funnel plot asymmetry; ORadj = trim-and-fill adjusted effect size; kout = number of outliers detected; ORout = odds ratio estimate with outliers removed; FSN = fail-safe N; Non-trauma = integrated non-trauma-focused treatment; Trauma = trauma-focused treatment; v. = versus; Manual SUD = manualized SUD treatments