Table 3.
Indirect effects model
| Within-person associations | Association | b | [95% CI] | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autocorrelations | Enacted bi+ stigma (t-1) →Enacted bi+ stigma (t) | 0.34 | [0.26, 0.41] | <.001 |
| Using to cope (t-1) → Using to cope (t) | 0.58 | [0.45, 0.68] | <.001 | |
| CUDIT (t-1) → CUDIT (t) | 0.29 | [0.16, 0.39] | <.001 | |
| Prospective associations | Enacted bi+ stigma (t-2) → Using to cope (t-1) | 0.06 | [0.03, 0.11] | <.001 |
| Using to cope (t-1) → CuDIT (t) | 0.14 | [0.02, 0.27] | .02 | |
| Enacted bi+ stigma (t-2) → CUDIT (t) | 0.05 | [-0.04, 0.14] | .26 |
| Between-person associations | Outcome | Predictor | b | [95% CI] | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUDIT | Enacted bi+ stigma | −0.44 | [−2.17, 0.40] | .36 | |
| Using to cope | 1.04 | [−0.24, 3.15] | .08 | ||
| Age at Wave 3 | −0.05 | [−0.69, 0.24] | .74 | ||
| Gender minority | 0.02 | [−0.19, 0.37] | .86 | ||
| Lesbian/gay | 0.10 | [−0.35, 0.35] | .46 | ||
| Queer | 0.22 | [-0.03, 0.61] | .06 | ||
| Pansexual | 0.08 | [−0.14, 0.32] | .42 | ||
| Other sexual identity | 0.29 | [−0.02, 0.77] | .06 | ||
| Black | −0.18 | [−0.98, 0.27] | .44 | ||
| Latinx | -0.04 | [-0.48, 0.19] | .79 | ||
| Other race/ethnicity | −0.06 | [−0.52, 0.19] | .61 | ||
| Using to cope | Enacted bi+ stigma | 0.21 | [−0.62, 0.80] | .67 | |
| Age at Wave 3 | 0.19 | [−0.07, 0.46] | .14 | ||
| Gender minority | −0.10 | [−0.42, 0.10] | .44 | ||
| Lesbian/gay | −0.002 | [−0.27, 0.30] | .98 | ||
| Queer | −0.15 | [−0.44, 0.07] | .17 | ||
| Pansexual | 0.001 | [−0.21, 0.24] | .99 | ||
| Other sexual identity | −0.27 | [−0.47, -0.08] | .01 | ||
| Black | 0.35 | [0.07, 0.61] | .02 | ||
| Latinx | 0.11 | [−0.15, 0.35] | .39 | ||
| Other race/ethnicity | 0.14 | [−0.11, 0.37] | .16 |
Notes: Reference groups for categorical predictors are cisgender women (gender identity); bisexual (sexual identity); non-Latinx White (race/ethnicity). CI = confidence interval; CUDIT = Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test.
