Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;83(1):126–133. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2022.83.126

Table 3.

Indirect effects model

graphic file with name jsad.2022.83.126tbl3.jpg

Within-person associations Association b [95% CI] P
Autocorrelations Enacted bi+ stigma (t-1) →Enacted bi+ stigma (t) 0.34 [0.26, 0.41] <.001
Using to cope (t-1) → Using to cope (t) 0.58 [0.45, 0.68] <.001
CUDIT (t-1) → CUDIT (t) 0.29 [0.16, 0.39] <.001
Prospective associations Enacted bi+ stigma (t-2) → Using to cope (t-1) 0.06 [0.03, 0.11] <.001
Using to cope (t-1) → CuDIT (t) 0.14 [0.02, 0.27] .02
Enacted bi+ stigma (t-2) → CUDIT (t) 0.05 [-0.04, 0.14] .26
Between-person associations Outcome Predictor b [95% CI] P
CUDIT Enacted bi+ stigma −0.44 [−2.17, 0.40] .36
Using to cope 1.04 [−0.24, 3.15] .08
Age at Wave 3 −0.05 [−0.69, 0.24] .74
Gender minority 0.02 [−0.19, 0.37] .86
Lesbian/gay 0.10 [−0.35, 0.35] .46
Queer 0.22 [-0.03, 0.61] .06
Pansexual 0.08 [−0.14, 0.32] .42
Other sexual identity 0.29 [−0.02, 0.77] .06
Black −0.18 [−0.98, 0.27] .44
Latinx -0.04 [-0.48, 0.19] .79
Other race/ethnicity −0.06 [−0.52, 0.19] .61
Using to cope Enacted bi+ stigma 0.21 [−0.62, 0.80] .67
Age at Wave 3 0.19 [−0.07, 0.46] .14
Gender minority −0.10 [−0.42, 0.10] .44
Lesbian/gay −0.002 [−0.27, 0.30] .98
Queer −0.15 [−0.44, 0.07] .17
Pansexual 0.001 [−0.21, 0.24] .99
Other sexual identity −0.27 [−0.47, -0.08] .01
Black 0.35 [0.07, 0.61] .02
Latinx 0.11 [−0.15, 0.35] .39
Other race/ethnicity 0.14 [−0.11, 0.37] .16

Notes: Reference groups for categorical predictors are cisgender women (gender identity); bisexual (sexual identity); non-Latinx White (race/ethnicity). CI = confidence interval; CUDIT = Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test.