Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;33(2):387–400. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021091191

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Random forests demonstrating predictive ability of various molecular and histologic features of rejection for %dd-cfDNA 1.0 in N=300. (A) Relative variable importance using molecular predictors. (B) Relative variable importance using histologic predictors. In both figures, ABMR and overall rejection related variables are the most important predictors of high %dd-cfDNA.