Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 14;70(1):33–43. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934587

Table 1.

Metabolic effects of ATV and ATV+SM treatment.

Control ATV p1 ATV+SM p2
Body weight (g) 409 ± 7 420 ± 7 NS 416 ± 8 NS
Relative weight of epididymal fat (g/100 g body weight) 1.50 ± 0.09 1.74 ± 0.08 NS 1.44 ± 0.08 <0.05
TG (mmol/l) 4.29 ± 0.21 2.30 ± 0.11 <0.001 1.51 ± 0.09 <0.001
NEFA (mmol/l) 0.69 ± 0.05 0.79 ± 0.05 NS 0.63 ± 0.03 NS
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.77 ± 0.04 1.85 ± 0.02 NS 1.85 ± 0.05 NS
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.01 ± 0.04 1.21 ± 0.03 <0.01 1.24 ± 0.05 NS
Insulin (nmol/l) 0.21 ± 0.03 0.32 ± 0.03 <0.05 0.16 ± 0.02 <0.01
Non-fasting glucose (mmol/l) 8.86 ± 0.17 9.50 ± 0.16 <0.05 9.80 ± 0.13 NS
AUC 0–120 min (mmol/l/2 h) 729 ± 17 739 ± 7 NS 678 ± 18 <0.05
Creatine kinase (μkat/l) 3.85 ± 0.28 3.11 ± 0.32 NS 3.48 ± 0.25 NS

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n=8/group. p1 denotes significant difference between the control vs. ATV treated groups, p2 denotes significant difference between ATV vs. ATV+SM treated groups, NS – not significant difference. ATV – experimental group of rats treated with atorvastatin, ATV+SM – experimental group of rats treated with atorvastatin and silymarin, TG – triglycerides, NEFA – nonesterified fatty acids, AUC0–120 min – the area under the curve during the oral glucose tolerance test.