Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sleep Health. 2021 Dec 23;8(1):39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2021.11.001

Table 3.

Relationship between bedsharing, presence of maternal depressive symptoms, and maternal perception of an infant sleep problema

Bedsharing
Unadjusted Relative Risk
Ratio (95% CI)a
Adjusted Relative
Risk Ratio (95% CI)a
CONCURRENT MODELS
Model 1
Depressive symptomsb, yes 1.62 (1.04-2.52) *
Model 2
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes 1.90 (1.21-2.99) *
Model 3 c
Depressive symptomsb, yes -- 1.52 (0.99-2.33)
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes -- 1.79 (1.12-2.86) *
LAGGED MODELS (Time t→ Time t+1) d
Model 4
Depressive symptomsb, yes 1.66 (1.07-2.58) *
Model 5
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes 1.82 (1.11-2.99) *
Model 6 e
Depressive symptomsb, yes -- 1.31 (0.68-2.51)
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes -- 1.92 (0.96-3.84)

Note. 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval

a

Mixed-effects multinomial models tested longitudinal associations. Robust clusters were used to control for repeated measures across subjects. All models were adjusted for visit.

b

Presence of depressive symptoms indicated by score ≥ 16 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, measured at each visit.

c

Model adjusted for visit and study intervention group. Chi-square goodness of fit for multinomial models=p>0.05.

d

t is the timepoint (i.e., home visit) preceding time t+1; t+1 is the timepoint succeeding time t.

e

Model adjusted for visit, breastfeeding outcomes (exclusivity and duration), infant distress to limitations, infant activity level, and study intervention group. Chi-square goodness of fit for multinomial models= p>0.05.

*

p<0.05