Table 3.
Bedsharing |
||
---|---|---|
Unadjusted Relative Risk Ratio (95% CI)a |
Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio (95% CI)a |
|
CONCURRENT MODELS | ||
Model 1 | ||
Depressive symptomsb, yes | 1.62 (1.04-2.52) * | |
Model 2 | ||
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes | 1.90 (1.21-2.99) * | |
Model 3 c | ||
Depressive symptomsb, yes | -- | 1.52 (0.99-2.33) |
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes | -- | 1.79 (1.12-2.86) * |
LAGGED MODELS (Time t→ Time t+1) d | ||
Model 4 | ||
Depressive symptomsb, yes | 1.66 (1.07-2.58) * | |
Model 5 | ||
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes | 1.82 (1.11-2.99) * | |
Model 6 e | ||
Depressive symptomsb, yes | -- | 1.31 (0.68-2.51) |
Perception of an infant sleep problem, yes | -- | 1.92 (0.96-3.84) |
Note. 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval
Mixed-effects multinomial models tested longitudinal associations. Robust clusters were used to control for repeated measures across subjects. All models were adjusted for visit.
Presence of depressive symptoms indicated by score ≥ 16 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, measured at each visit.
Model adjusted for visit and study intervention group. Chi-square goodness of fit for multinomial models=p>0.05.
t is the timepoint (i.e., home visit) preceding time t+1; t+1 is the timepoint succeeding time t.
Model adjusted for visit, breastfeeding outcomes (exclusivity and duration), infant distress to limitations, infant activity level, and study intervention group. Chi-square goodness of fit for multinomial models= p>0.05.
p<0.05