Table I.
Seven interconnected principles for enhancing resilience in conservation (adapted from Biggs et al., 2012)
Principle | Importance to conservation resilience | Examples of ecological components | Examples of socio-cultural components | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Properties to be managed | ||||
1 | Maintain diversity and redundancy | Provides mitigation against impacts and back-up options for responding to change and disturbance | Species, genes, habitat patches | Livelihood strategies, social groups, cultural lifeways |
2 | Manage connectivity | Movement of material, resources, or information is facilitated by the strength and structure of linkages | Habitat corridors | Social networks between actors |
3 | Manage slow variables and feedbacks | Underlying variables that regulate or stabilise the system can cause dramatic changes if critical thresholds are exceeded | Flood regulation, disease control, climate | Traditions, cultural values, legal systems |
Attributes to be incorporated into governance system | ||||
4 | Foster understanding of social–ecological systems as complex adaptive systems | Emphasises holistic, flexible approaches to managing multiple dynamic components | ||
5 | Encourage learning and experimentation | Enables on-going knowledge growth and collaborative solution development to respond to change | ||
6 | Broaden participation | Improves understanding of system dynamics, legitimacy, and cooperation | ||
7 | Promote polycentric governance systems (multi-level, nested hierarchies) | Capitalises on scale-specific knowledge and directs resources and responsibilities at most effective level |