Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;37(5):e37. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e37

Table 2. Baseline and post-treatment CLSS grade, depressed volume due to lipoatrophy, and skin elasticity.

Group Baseline Week 1 Week 4 Week 12 Week 24 P valuec
CLSS grade 2.24 ± 0.71 1.12 ± 0.32 1.20 ± 0.40 1.20 ± 0.40 1.28 ± 0.45 < 0.001
Improvement rate, %a - 50 46.4 46.4 42.9
P valued - < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Depressed volume, mm3 21.37 ± 20.67 14.20 ± 14.10 14.48 ± 14.45 15.54 ± 14.79 15.55 ± 15.11 < 0.001
Improvement rate, %a - 32.9 31.2 26.1 25.4
P valued - < 0.001 < 0.001 0.002 0.001
Skin elasticity, R2 0.62 ± 0.11 0.68 ± 0.14 0.63 ± 0.09 0.59 ± 0.10 0.63 ± 0.12 0.021
Improvement rate, %b - 9.3 1.0 −4.5 1.6
P valued - 0.033 0.677 0.101 0.623

Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistically significant P values are in bold.

CLSS = Carruthers Lipoatrophy Severity Scale, R2 = percentage of viscoelasticity.

aDefined as (baseline measurement − follow-up measurement)/baseline measurement × 100%; bDefined as (follow-up measurement − baseline measurement)/baseline measurement × 100%; cRepeated measures analysis of variance, with the Greenhouse-Geisser correction. P < 0.05 was considered significant; dPost-hoc analysis of each time point with the Wilcoxon signed rank test with the Bonferroni correction, where P < 0.010 was considered significant.