Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 23;247:118852. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118852

Table 2.

Cross-lagged panel model results linking amygdala volumes and intrinsic SC and CC network functional connectivity.

Subcortical Network Cognitive Control Network
Parameter Estimated b(SE) r/β p b(SE) r/β p
amygdala volume → connectivity .006 (.10) .004 and .008 .96 .075 (.065) .087 and .16 .25
connectivity → amygdala volume .035 (.082) .025 and .019 .67 −.077 (.17) −.027 and −.026 .64
autoregressive paths: amygdala volume 1.11 (.10) .58 and .83 < .001 1.11 (.10) .58 and .83 < .001
autoregressive paths: connectivity .42 (.070) .43 and .41 < .001 .50 (.090) .39 and .48 < .001
within-person correlations time 1 .002 (.001) .10 .20 −.001 (.001) −.089 .26
time 2 and time 3 −.003 (.005) −.13 and −.13 .20 .002 (.003) .13 and .15 .51

Amygdala volumes were linearly transformed by multiplying mean volumes (adjusted for total brain volume per participant) by 1000; unstandardized coefficients reflect the relationships between intrinsic network connectivity and linearly transformed amygdala volumes; “b” = unstandardized parameter estimate; “SE” = standard error about the unstandardized parameter estimate; “r/β” = standardized parameter estimate (correlation/prediction, respectively), listed for T1 → T2 then T2 → T3 when applicable