Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 20;95(1130):20210718. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210718

Table 3.

Comparison of relationship between the mean parotid gland doses and washout rates after radiotherapy with previous studies

Authors Evaluation methods Number of subjects Radiation methods Mean parotid dose Washout rates
Gupta et al.14 Scintigraphy 82 IMRT
3D-CRT
Ipsilateral: 50.5 Gy
Contralateral: 35.4 Gy
3 M: 26%, 12 M: 38%,
24 M: 59%, 36M:65.3%
Maes et al.9 Scintigraphy 78 3D-CRT 21 Gy 4 W: 31%
28 W: 79%
Roesink et al. (2004)3 Scintigraphy 192 3D-CRT 33.1 Gy 6 W: 42%
12 M: 72%
Braam et al.15 Questionnaire
Sialometry
44 3D-CRT Rt: 28.3 Gy
Lt: 27.9 Gy
6 W: 35%, 6 M: 47%,
12 M: 69%
Roesink et al. (2001)16 Sialometry 174 3D-CRT 40 Gy 6 W: 35%, 6 M: 50%
12 M: 58%
Itonaga et al. Scintigraphy 62 IMRT
3D-CRT
35.8 Gy 3 M: 0%
12 M: 58%

3D-CRT, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy.