Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec 17;82(6):1435–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.020

Table 1:

Distribution of Treatment Suggestions for Melanoma In Situ and Invasive Melanoma Case Diagnoses by Pathologist Characteristics

Melanoma in situ treatment suggestion IM treatment suggestiona
excision excision Excision excision Excision
< 0.5cm 0.5-<1cmb ≥ 1cm < 1cm ≥ 1cmb
No. case readings 111 665 137 438 2711

Affiliation with academic medical center
 No 2833 80 (13%) 449 (72%) 96 (15%) 339 (15%) 1869 (85%)
 Yes 1229 31 (11 %) 216 (75%) 41 (14%) 99 (11 %) 842 (89%)
Fellowship or board certified in dermatopathology
 No 2308 89 (17%) 330 (62%) 114 (21%) 328 (18%) 1447 (82%)
 Yes 1754 22 (6%) 335 (88%) 23 (6%) 110 (8%) 1264 (92%)
Years interpreting melanocytic skin lesions
 < 10 years 1583 19 (6%) 273 (80%) 50 (15%) 56 (5%) 1185 (95%)
 10 years + 2479 92 (16%) 392 (69%) 87 (15%) 382 (20%) 1526 (80%)
Percent of caseload represented by melanocytic skin lesions
 < 10 percent 1581 62 (17%) 219 (61%) 76 (21 %) 250 (20%) 974 (80%)
 ≥ 10 percent 2481 49 (9%) 446 (80%) 61 (11 %) 188 (10%) 1737 (90%)
a.

IM=invasive melanoma

b.

NCCN guidelines for surgical margins for primary melanoma (exceptions to these guidelines exist for both melanoma in situ and invasive melanoma).