Skip to main content
. 2001 Aug;39(8):2846–2849. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2846-2849.2001

TABLE 3.

Performance of all assay systems for the detection of CDAD using the final diagnosis based on clinical and laboratory criteria as the gold standard

Assay method Result Specimens from patients for whom CDAD status was determined to be (n = 193a):
Performance characteristics (%)
Positive (n = 56) Negative (n = 137) Sensitivity Specificity PPVb NPVc
Cytotoxin Positive 55 2 98 99 96 99
Negative 1 135
ImmunoCard Toxin A Positive 30 2 54 99 94 84
Negative 26 135
Oxoid Toxin A Positive 28 3 50 98 91 83
Negative 28 134
TechLab Toxin A/B Positive 44 3 79 98 94 92
Negative 12 134
Premier Toxin A&B Positive 45 3 80 98 94 93
Negative 11 134
Culture Positive 32 0 57 100 100 85
Negative 24 137
a

For five patients from whom 7 of 200 specimens were submitted, full clinical details were not accessible. These seven specimens are excluded from the analysis. 

b

PPV, predictive value of a positive result. 

c

NPV, predictive value of a negative result.