Underbrink et al. [21] |
Rocky Mountain |
4-year retrospective study |
5063 |
High |
No differences in neurologic deficit or patient disposition in the older adult patient with cervical spine trauma despite changes in spinal restriction protocols and resulting differences in immobilization devices |
Oosterwold et al. [19] |
Netherlands |
Retrospective observational study |
1082 |
Moderate |
Consensus among EMS staff on how to interpret the criterion ‘distracting injury’ was lacking. Adverse effects of spinal immobilisation were incompletely documented in pre-hospital care reports. To provide validated information on potential symptoms of SCI, a uniform EMS scoring system for motoric assessment should be developed |
Vanderlan et al. [22] |
Louisiana State, USA |
Retrospective observational study |
199 |
Moderate |
Cervical spine immobilisation was associated with an increased risk of death (p < 0.02, Odds ratio 2.77, 95% CI 1.18–6.49) |
Haut et al. [16] |
USA |
Retrospective observational study |
45,284 |
High |
Pre-hospital spine immobilisation was associated with higher mortality in penetrating trauma and should not be routinely used in every patient with penetrating trauma |
Brown et al. [14] |
New York, USA |
Retrospective observational study |
75,567 |
High |
Documented benefits of pre-hospital spinal immobilisation in patients with torso gunshot wounds remains unproven, despite the potential to interfere with emergent care in this patient population |
Hauswalk et al. [15] |
Malaysia and New Mexico |
Retrospective observational study |
454 |
Moderate |
Out-of-hospital immobilisation has little or no effect on neurologic outcome in patients with blunt spinal injuries |
Lemyze et al. [17] |
Unknown |
Retrospective observational study |
1 |
Low |
Early removal of a neck stabilisation can increase harm to patients after hanging due to raised intracranial pressure |
Lin et al. [18] |
Asia |
Retrospective observational study |
8633 |
High |
Incidence of cervical spinal injuries in the urban area lightweight motorcyclist is very low. Pre-hospital protocol for application of a cervical collar brace to people who have sustained a lightweight motorcycle accident in the urban area should be revised to avoid unnecessary restraint and possible complications |
Barkana et al. [13] |
Israel |
Retrospective observational study |
36 |
Moderate |
Life-threatening complications due to penetrating neck injury are common and may be overlooked if the neck is covered by a stabilisation device |