Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 21;48(1):61–69. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01552-5

Table 5.

Subgroup analysis of patients who underwent primary laparotomy or laparoscopic repair with PULP score < 4 points after propensity score matching with age

Primary laparotomy (n = 95) Laparoscopic repair (n = 95) p value
Age 48.9 ± 11 (17–65) 46.9 ± 12.2 (18–65) 0.221
PULP score 2.3 ± 1 (0–3) 2.2 ± 0.9 (0–3) 0.761
Boey score 0.2 ± 0.4 (0–1) 0.2 ± 0.5 (0–2) 1.000
ASA score 2.6 ± 0.5 (1–3) 2.6 ± 0.5 (1–3) 0.891
Operation method
 Simple closure 95 (100%) 95 (100%)
Ulcer size (cm) 0.7 ± 0.5 (0.2–3) 0.6 ± 0.3 (0.2–2) 0.135
Operation time (min) 124.5 ± 58.7 (47–524) 133.9 ± 43.6 (56–278) 0.211
Intraoperative blood loss (ml) 24.1 ± 46.8 (0–300) 14.6 ± 25.6 (0–150) 0.084
Intraoperative blood transfusion 6 (6.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0.029
Length of hospital stay (days) 8.3 ± 2.9 (5–22) 7.2 ± 1.8 (4–17) 0.003
Length of ICU stay (days) 0.3 ± 1.2 (0–8) 0.1 ± 0.5 (0–4) 0.053
Mortality 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Complication Classification III and IVa 5 (5.3%) 3 (3.2%) 0.721
Wound infection 4 (4.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0.121
Residual abscess 3 (3.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0.246
Leakage 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) -
Wound disruption 2 (2.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0.497
Pulmonary complicationsb 3 (3.2%) 4 (4.2%) 1.000

aIncluding complications with Clavien–Dindo Classification III and IV

bIncluding pneumonia, empyema, pleural effusion, and pulmonary edema