Table 3.

Main associations between fast-food outlet density and proximity, food insecurity and dietary quality (n 226)

	Outcome
	Food insecurity score (continuous)
	Crude model†			Adjusted model‡
	b §	95 % CI		b §	95 % CI
FFD (within 500 m)	−0·023	−0·082; 0·037		−0·026	−0·076; 0·024
FFP (per 10 m)	−0·009	−0·043; 0·025		−0·003	−0·033; 0·026

FFP, fast-food outlet proximity; FFD, fast-food outlet density.

^* P < 0·05.

^†Crude model: merely including FFD, FFP or food insecurity as determinant, clustered by district (n 7).

^‡Adjusted model: crude model additionally adjusted for age, sex, migration background, household size, marital status, household income and educational level.

^§ b Represents the difference in food insecurity score (higher = more food insecure) or dietary quality (higher = better adherence to dietary guidelines).

^‖OR, odds ratio for being food insecure (being food secure = reference).