Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 6;25(1):51–60. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001439

Table 2.

Personification techniques used in top three tweets from each brand, ranked by the number of retweets

Company Number of retweets Number of likes Number of comments Product-related personification* Use of humour Non-mainstream group reference Trending topic reference Informal or trendy language
Wendy’s 40 000 213 000 3700
Wendy’s 26 000 99 000 2200
Wendy’s 23 000 104 000 1100
Denny’s 22 000 86 000 1300
Hamburger Helper 16 000 15 000 244
Moonpie 7300 74 000 285
Moonpie 3700 17 000 284
Moonpie 2600 28 000 183
Taco Bell 2000 6400 310
Denny’s 1300 8900 691
Arby’s 1300 7800 312
Arby’s 1000 4800 52
Arby’s 901 6900 194
Hamburger Helper 737 2800 40
Oreo 702 4000 2200
Hamburger Helper 656 2400 29
Taco Bell 595 6600 101
Burger King 550 2200 992
Burger King 518 3600 188
Taco Bell 472 1000 239
Burger King 467 2800 137
Denny’s 311 2300 29
Oreo 247 994 37
Skittles 112 894 43
DiGiorno 97 914 95
Skittles 89 362 28
DiGiorno 87 952 93
Skittles 63 360 59
Oreo 56 118 9
DiGiorno 45 787 29
Totals 152 905 703 881 15 203
 Mean 22 21 14 13 11
 sd 73·3 70·0 46·7 43·3 36·7
*

This column refers to the personification strategy described as ‘product centering’ in the text. This specific column refers to the occurrence of a tweet that primarily existed to personify the brand but still mentioned or pictured the product, as opposed to primarily existing to promote the product, or not mentioning the product at all.