Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 9;18(2):20210603. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0603

Table 2.

Compilation of divergence age estimations for Crocodylia. Except for Roos et al. [9], all the age intervals represent the 95% highest posterior densities (HPD).

reference Crocodylia divergence age estimates (Ma) time-calibrated technique clock model tree model
Roos et al. [9] 101 ± 3.0 molecular clock (node calibration) r8s non-parametric rate smoothing (NPRS)
Oaks [10] 81.08–90.00 molecular clock (node calibration) relaxed uncorrelated lognormal Yule or birth–death process
Turner et al. [43] 81.02–114.25 tip-dating (morphology only) relaxed uncorrelated lognormal birth–death process
Lee & Yates [11] 90.0–110.0 tip-dating (total evidence) relaxed uncorrelated lognormal birth–death process
Pan et al. [12] 83.6–90.02 molecular clock (node calibration) relaxed uncorrelated lognormal Yule process
this work 86.77–103.09 tip-dating (total evidence) relaxed uncorrelated lognormal birth–death process