Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;7:6. doi: 10.21037/tgh-19-373

Table 3. NBI Endoscopy—Barrett’s oesophagus classification systems.

Morphological classifications and their performance Kansas (25) Nottingham (26) Amsterdam (27) Barrett’s International NBI group (BING) (28)
Morphology
   1) Normal Mucosal pattern (MP): circular Type A: round/oval pits with regular microvasculature (MW) MP: regular MP: circular, ridged/villous, or tubular
Vascular pattern (VP): normal VP: regular VP: blood vessels situated regularly along or between mucosa ridges and/or those showing normal, long, branching patterns
Abnormal blood vessels (ABV): absent
   2) Intestinal metaplasia MP: ridged/villous Type B: villous/ridge/linear pits with regular MW MP-regular Not tested
VP: normal Type C: absent pits with regular MW VP-regular (villous/gyrus)
ABV: absent
   3) Dysplasia MP: irregular/distorted Type D: distorted pits with irregular MW MP-irregular MP: absent or irregular patterns
VP: abnormal VP: irregular VP: focally or diffusely distributed vessels not following normal architecture of the mucosa
ABV: present
Performance of various classifications Sensitivity, specificity, & Positive predictive value (PPV) of ridge/villous pattern for diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia (IM) without high grade dysplasia (HGD) were 93.5%, 86.7%, and 94.7%, respectively 87.9% in magnification endoscopy corresponded to histological diagnosis The magnified NBI images had a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 76%, a PPV of 64%, and a NPV of 98% for HGIN High confidence
The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of irregular/distorted pattern for HGD were 100%, 98.7%, and 95.3%, respectively PPV & negative predictive value (NPV) for type A (Columnar mucosa without IM) was 100% & 97% respectively No data on observer agreement predictions by the experts yielded high accuracy
For Type B & C (IM) was 88% and 91% respectively sensitivity, and specificity (92%, 91%, and 93% respectively)
For Type D (high grade dysplasia) was 81 & 99% Inter-observer agreement was substantial (k=0.681)
Inter and Intraobserver agreement was Kappa of 0.71–0.87 (Nonexperts) and 0.78–0.91(Experts)