Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov;50(11):2161–2171. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7570

Table 2:

Risk of bias assessment in the included studies

Study (yr) Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of participants and personnel Blinding of out-come assessment Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting Other bias
An (2018)(4) H U U U L U U
Du (2015)(5) H U U U L U U
Gu (2015)(6) H U U U L U U
Guan (2013)(7) L H H H L U L
Guo (2017)(8) H U U U L U U
Huang (2012)(9) H U U U L U U
Jin (2015)(10) U U U U L U U
Li (2013)(11) U H H H L U U
Li (2012)(12) U H H H L U U
Li (2012)(13) U U U U L U U
Liu (2009)(14) U H H H L U U
Mao (2017)(15) L U U U L U L
Qiao (2009)(16) U H H H L U U
Ren (2010)(17) H H H H L U U
Shi (2018)(18) H U U U L U U
Sun (2011)(19) U H H H L U U
Tian (2006)(20) U H H H L U U
Wang (2013)(21) L H H H L U L
Wu (2009)(22) H H H H L U U
Wu (2016)(23) U U U U L U U
Zhai (2008)(24) U U U U L U U
Zhao (2016)(25) U U U U L U U
Zhao (2016)(26) U U U U L U U
Zhu (2018)(27) U U U U L U U

H, high risk; L, low risk; U, unclear risk.