Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017 Dec 29;17(2):145–161. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1418665

Table 9.

Rotarix response in HIV-exposed and HIV-unexposed-uninfected infants.

Reference Location Income
groupd
Vaccine No of
doses
Measured factors HIV-uninfected infantsa
p-Value
HIV-exposed HIV-unexposed
Gastanaduy et al. 2016 [35] Botswana UM RV1 2 Effectivenessb after 1 or 2 years (95% CI) 32 (−121, 79) 44 (−34, 76) NS
Groome et al. 2014 [155] South Africa UM RV1 1 Effectivenessc after 1 or 2 years (95% CI) 61 (22,81) 24 (−17, 51) NS
2 64 (34, 80) 54 (31, 69)
Chilengi et al. 2016 [56] Zambia LM RV1 2 IgA seroconversion rate 54% 62% NS

HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; NS: non-statistically significant (p > 0.05).

a

An HIV-uninfected child was judged to be HIV-exposed if the mother gave history of testing HIV positive during pregnancy, or HIV-unexposed if the mother had a history of negative HIV test during pregnancy.

b

Against severe RVGE;

c

Against any RVGE;

d

World Bank list of economies (December 2016) low-income (L); lower middle-income (LM); upper middle-income (UM); high-income (H).