Table 9.
Reference | Location | Income groupd |
Vaccine | No of doses |
Measured factors | HIV-uninfected infantsa |
p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIV-exposed | HIV-unexposed | |||||||
Gastanaduy et al. 2016 [35] | Botswana | UM | RV1 | 2 | Effectivenessb after 1 or 2 years (95% CI) | 32 (−121, 79) | 44 (−34, 76) | NS |
Groome et al. 2014 [155] | South Africa | UM | RV1 | 1 | Effectivenessc after 1 or 2 years (95% CI) | 61 (22,81) | 24 (−17, 51) | NS |
2 | 64 (34, 80) | 54 (31, 69) | ||||||
Chilengi et al. 2016 [56] | Zambia | LM | RV1 | 2 | IgA seroconversion rate | 54% | 62% | NS |
HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; NS: non-statistically significant (p > 0.05).
An HIV-uninfected child was judged to be HIV-exposed if the mother gave history of testing HIV positive during pregnancy, or HIV-unexposed if the mother had a history of negative HIV test during pregnancy.
Against severe RVGE;
Against any RVGE;
World Bank list of economies (December 2016) low-income (L); lower middle-income (LM); upper middle-income (UM); high-income (H).