Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 11;41(3):e69–e74. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003402

TABLE 5.

Proportion of Prescriptions of the Different Agents as Prophylaxis or Empiric Treatment in the Groups With Underlying Malignancies and HSCT Categorized by Risk

Antifungal agent Prophylaxis Empiric treatment
High risk (n = 449) Non-high risk + neutropenia (n = 54) Solid tumors (n = 97) High risk (n = 81) Non-high risk + neutropenia (n = 33) Solid tumors (n = 33)
L-AmB 175 (39.0%) 20 (37.0%) 42 (43.3%) 46 (56.8%) 17 (51.5%) 17 (51.5%)
Itraconazole 187 (41.6%) 12 (22.2%) 17 (17.5%) 1 (1.2%) 0 0
Voriconazole 26 (5.8%) 6 (11.1%) 15 (15.5%) 7 (8.6%) 3 (9.0%) 4 (12.2%)
Posaconazole 36 (8.0%) 3 (5.6%) 0 7 (8.6%) 1 (3.0%) 0
Fluconazole 5 (1.1%) 8 (14.8%) 15 (15.5%) 4 (4.9%) 8 (24.2%) 8 (24.2%)
Echinocandins 18 (4.0%) 5 (9.2%) 7 (7.2%) 12 (14.8%) 4 (12.1%) 3 (9.1%)
Other 2 (0.4%) 0 1 (1.0%) 4 (4.9%) 0 1 (3.0%)

High risk: post-HSCT patients, relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, relapsed acute myeloid leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma. Non-high risk: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (regardless of chemotherapy protocol), other leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphomas.