Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 9;23:131. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05068-4

Table 2.

Comparison of post-fatigue MIFs with NT and KT

Taping MIGF (N) MIDT (N-m) MIPF (N)
NT 280.8 ± 36.0 4.0 ± 0.6 99.9 ± 6.6
KT 293.3 ± 43.3 4.2 ± 0.7 100.4 ± 9.1
p-value 0.039 * 0.044 * 0.426

*Significant difference between NT and KT conditions. Data expressed as mean ± SD