Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;36(11):2084–2093. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa332

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted associations between mean delivered UF rate and incident atrial fibrillation a

HR (95% CI)
Modelb UF rate >13 (versus ≤13 mL/h/kg) UF rate >10 (versus ≤10 mL/h/kg) UF rate >8 (versus ≤8 mL/h/kg)
0 1.21 (1.10–1.31) 1.08 (1.00–1.15) 1.08 (1.01–1.15)
1 1.22 (1.12–1.33) 1.10 (1.02–1.17) 1.10 (1.03–1.17)
2 1.22 (1.11–1.32) 1.09 (1.02–1.17) 1.10 (1.03–1.17)
3 1.16 (1.06–1.27) 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 1.08 (1.01–1.15)
4 1.15 (1.04–1.25) 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 1.09 (1.02–1.16)
a

Extended Cox models with multiple imputation for missing data were used to compute adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for the association of each delivered UF rate exposure and incident atrial fibrillation. All models were stratified by year of incident end-stage kidney disease.

b

Model 0, unadjusted; Model 1, additionally adjusted for age, sex, race and Hispanic ethnicity; Model 2, additionally adjusted for census division, socioeconomic status variables and Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibility; Model 3, additionally adjusted for all comorbid conditions listed in Table 1, number of hospital days in 30 days prior to UF rate ascertainment period and vascular access type; Model 4, additionally adjusted for predialysis systolic and diastolic BP, number of dialysis sessions during UF rate ascertainment period and serum albumin, eGFR, potassium and calcium.