Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;8:804663. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.804663

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effect of conservation agriculture on the nutrient content of maize variety DKC 9089 during two seasons of field trials. Error bars represent SEM. *, **, and *** mean, significant at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively, Tukey's HSD test. Values in (J,K) are the number of fold-change compared to treatment T1 (conventional practise). Treatments: T1 = conventional agriculture; sole maize. T2 = conservation agriculture (CA); basin sowing; sole maize. T3 = CA; dibble stick sowing; sole maize. T4–5 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-cowpea rotation. T6 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-pigeon pea intercrop. T7 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-cowpea intercrop. T8 = CA; dibble stick sowing; maize-velvet bean intercrop.